scispace - formally typeset
K

Katherine H O Deane

Researcher at University of East Anglia

Publications -  98
Citations -  4621

Katherine H O Deane is an academic researcher from University of East Anglia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 93 publications receiving 4042 citations. Previous affiliations of Katherine H O Deane include University of Birmingham & RMIT University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

TL;DR: Meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses suggested little or no effect of increasing LCn3 on all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality, cardiovascular mortality and stroke, and it may makelittle or no difference to CHD events.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease

TL;DR: Benefit for physiotherapy was found in most outcomes over the short term but was significant only for speed, two- or six-minute walk test, Freezing of Gait questionnaire, and clinician-rated disability using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physiotherapy intervention in Parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials found no evidence that the treatment effect differed across the interventions for any outcomes assessed, apart from motor subscores on the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques.

TL;DR: This review shows that a wide range of physiotherapy interventions to treat PD have been tested and there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of one physiotherapy intervention over another in PD.
Journal ArticleDOI

Public Release of Performance Data in Changing the Behaviour of Healthcare Consumers, Professionals or Organisations

TL;DR: No consistent evidence that the public release of performance data changes consumer behaviour or improves care is provided, and evidence that it may have an impact on the behaviour of healthcare professionals or organisations is lacking.