The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 85

Current unprecedented declines in biodiversity reduce the ability of ecological communities to provide many fundamental ecosystem services. Here we evaluate evidence that reduced biodiversity affects the transmission of infectious diseases of humans, other animals and plants. In principle, loss of biodiversity could either increase or decrease disease transmission. However, mounting evidence indicates that biodiversity loss frequently increases disease transmission. In contrast, areas of naturally high biodiversity may serve as a source pool for new pathogens. Overall, despite many remaining questions, current evidence indicates that preserving intact ecosystems and their endemic biodiversity should generally reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases.

https://people.clas.ufl.edu/rdholt/files/247.pdf

Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases

Summary: Hantaviruses are enzootic viruses that maintain persistent infections in their rodent hosts without apparent disease symptoms. The spillover of these viruses to humans can lead to one of two serious illnesses, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. In recent years, there has been an improved understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and natural history of these viruses following an increase in the number of outbreaks in the Americas. In this review, current concepts regarding the ecology of and disease associated with these serious human pathogens are presented. Priorities for future research suggest an integration of the ecology and evolution of these and other host-virus ecosystems through modeling and hypothesis-driven research with the risk of emergence, host switching/spillover, and disease transmission to humans.

A Global Perspective on Hantavirus Ecology, Epidemiology, and Disease

Changes in Earth’s surface temperatures caused by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are expected to affect global and regional precipitation regimes. Interactions between changing precipitation regimes and other aspects of global change are likely to affect natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems as well as human society. Although much recent research has focused on assessing the responses of terrestrial ecosystems to rising carbon dioxide or temperature, relatively little research has focused on understanding how ecosystems respond to changes in precipitation regimes. Here we review predicted changes in global and regional precipitation regimes, outline the consequences of precipitation change for natural ecosystems and human activities, and discuss approaches to improving understanding of ecosystem responses to changing precipitation. Further, we introduce the Precipitation and Ecosystem Change Research Network (PrecipNet), a new interdisciplinary research network assembled to encourage and foster communication and collaboration across research groups with common interests in the impacts of global change on precipitation regimes, ecosystem structure and function, and the human enterprise.

/pdf/assessing-the-response-of-terrestrial-ecosystems-to-2einvwxf3l.pdf

Assessing the Response of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Potential Changes in Precipitation

Many museums and academic institutions maintain first-rate collections of biological materials, ranging from preserved whole organisms to DNA libraries and cell lines. These biological collections make innumerable contributions to science and society in areas as divergent as homeland secu- rity ,p ublic health and safety, monitoring of environmental change, and traditional taxonomy and systematics. Moreover, these collections save governments and taxpayers many millions of dollars each year by effectively guiding government spending, preventing catastrophic events in public health and safety, eliminating redundancy, and securing natural and agricultural resources. However, these contributions are widely underappre- ciated by the public and by policymakers, resulting in insufficient financial support for maintenance and improvement of biological collections.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054%5B0066:TVOMCF%5D2.0.CO;2

The Value of Museum Collections for Research and Society

I the spring of 1993, a previously undescribed disease emerged in the Southwest, killing 10 people during an 8-week period in May and June. Early during an infection, victims experienced flu-like symptoms for several days, but their condition suddenly and rapidly deteriorated as their lungs filled with fluids; death usually occurred within hours of the onset of this crisis period. There was no cure, no successful medication or treatment, and the disease agent (virus, bacterium, or toxin) was completely unknown. For the first few weeks, the mortality rate was 70%. Researchers from many disciplines immediately focused on the outbreak, attempting to identify the agent and understand the causes and dynamics of the disease. Within weeks, scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified the agent as a previously unknown hantavirus (Bunyaviridae), subsequently named Sin Nombre virus, or SNV (Nichol et al. 1993). Because hantaviruses were known to be transmitted by rodents, investigators undertook an intensive small mammal field sampling campaign in the Four Corners region of New Mexico and Arizona. Shortly thereafter, CDC identified the viral reservoir host as a common and widely distributed rodent, the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus (figure 1; Childs et al. 1994). During the identification period, on the medical side, physicians and medical staff made rapid progress in developing treatment methods to stabilize and sustain patients through the crisis period, thereby substantially improving patient survivorship; nonetheless, the mortality rate fell only to about 40%, where it remains today. The emergence of this new disease prompted many questions about its history, causes, and dynamics. Was this a newly Terry L. Yates (e-mail: tyates@unm.edu) is a professor in the Departments of Biology and Pathology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. Cheryl A. Parmenter, Robert R. Parmenter, John R. Vande Castle, Jorge Salazar-Bravo, and Jonathan L. Dunnum are with the Department of Biology and the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico. James N. Mills, Thomas G. Ksiazek, Stuart T. Nichol, and Joni C. Young are with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333. Charles H. Calisher and Barry J. Beaty are with the Arthropod-borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Foothills Campus, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. Kenneth D. Abbott is with the Department of Biology, Yavapai College, Prescott, AZ 86301. Michael L. Morrison is with the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ 85721. Robert J. Baker is with the Department of Biology and The Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409. Clarence J. Peters is with the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555. © 2002 American Institute of Biological Sciences. The Ecology and Evolutionary History of an Emergent Disease: Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5B0989:TEAEHO%5D2.0.CO;2

Kenneth D. Abbott

Papers

The Ecology and Evolutionary History of an Emergent Disease: Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome