K
Ketan H. Mhatre
Researcher at Claremont McKenna College
Publications - 9
Citations - 1656
Ketan H. Mhatre is an academic researcher from Claremont McKenna College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Positive organizational behavior & Authentic leadership. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 9 publications receiving 1363 citations. Previous affiliations of Ketan H. Mhatre include University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of 51 independent samples (representing a total of N � 12,567 employees) that met the inclusion criteria and found that the expected significant positive relationships between PsyCap and desirable employee attitudes (job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychological well-being), desirable employee behaviors (citizenship), and multiple measures of performance (self, supervisor evaluations, and objective).
Journal ArticleDOI
A call for longitudinal research in positive organizational behavior
TL;DR: In this article, the current status of psychological capital (PsyCap) is defined and the need to better understand its stability (i.e., state vs. trait) is addressed.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Longitudinal Analysis of Positive Psychological Constructs and Emotions on Stress, Anxiety, and Well-Being
TL;DR: In this paper, the influential role of the positive psychological capacities of hope, efficacy, optimism, resilience, as well as positive emotions on individual stress, anxiety, and well-being was investigated.
BookDOI
Advances in Theory and Research on Authentic Leadership
Bruce J. Avolio,Ketan H. Mhatre +1 more
Journal ArticleDOI
The Moderating Effect of Gender on Leadership Intervention Impact An Exploratory Review
TL;DR: A total of 57 intervention-based leadership studies that included sufficient data on leader and follower gender were included in this meta-analysis as mentioned in this paper, which showed a significant difference in the effect sizes for leadership interventions conducted with all-male and majority-male participants versus all-female and majority female participant studies.