scispace - formally typeset
K

Khim Kelly

Researcher at University of Central Florida

Publications -  32
Citations -  658

Khim Kelly is an academic researcher from University of Central Florida. The author has contributed to research in topics: Audit & Incentive. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 32 publications receiving 575 citations. Previous affiliations of Khim Kelly include Nanyang Technological University & College of Business Administration.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Teacher appraisal and its outcomes in Singapore primary schools

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the attributes of the performance appraisal system used for primary school teachers in Singapore, and how those attributes affect satisfaction with the appraisal system, stress experienced by teachers, attitudes towards performance bonus, job satisfaction and motivation, and perceived cooperativeness amongst teachers.
Posted Content

Feedback and Incentives on Non-Financial Value Drivers: Effects on Managerial Decision Making

TL;DR: The authors examined how adding leading non-financial value drivers to a lagging summary financial measure affects managerial decision making in firms where either intangible assets (intangible assets firm) or tangible assets (tangible assets) are more important for future financial performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do changes in audit actions and attitudes consistent with increased auditor scepticism deter aggressive earnings management? An experimental investigation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined whether different audit procedures and attitudes conveyed to management deter aggressive earnings management that may be fraudulent, and whether such different procedures and attitude conveyed influence managers' perceptions about the ethicality of any anticipated earnings management.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effects of Tangible Rewards versus Cash Rewards in Consecutive Sales Tournaments: A Field Experiment

TL;DR: This paper investigated the effects of tangible versus cash rewards in a repeated tournament setting and found that retailers eligible for tangible rewards significantly outperformed those eligible for cash rewards, and this effect was driven by Tournament One losers.