Background Assisted reproduction technology (ART) is used worldwide, at increasing rates, and data show that some adverse outcomes occur more frequently than following spontaneous conception (SC). Possible explanatory factors for the well-known adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons were evaluated. Methods PubMed and Cochrane databases from 1982 to 2012 were searched. Studies using donor or frozen oocytes were excluded, as well as those with no control group or including Results The search returned 1255 articles and 65 of these met the inclusion criteria. The following were identified as predictors for PTB in singletons: SC in couples with time to pregnancy (TTP) > 1 year versus SC singletons in couples with TTP ≤ 1 year [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22, 1.50]; IVF/ICSI versus SC singletons from subfertile couples (TTP > 1 year; AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30, 1.85); conception after ovulation induction and/or intrauterine insemination versus SC singletons where TTP ≤ 1 year (AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.21, 1.74); IVF/ICSI singletons versus their non-ART singleton siblings (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08, 1.49). The risk of PTB in singletons with a 'vanishing co-twin' versus from a single gestation was AOR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.54, 1.94) in the narrative data. ICSI versus IVF (AOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93), and frozen embryo transfer versus fresh embryo transfer (AOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94) were associated with a lower risk of PTB. Conclusions Subfertility is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons, however, even in the same mother an ART singleton has a poorer outcome than the non-ART sibling; hence, factors related to the hormone stimulation and/or IVF methods per se also may play a part. Further research is required into mechanisms of epigenetic modification in human embryos and the effects of cryopreservation on this, whether milder ovarian stimulation regimens can improve embryo quality and endometrial conditions, and whether longer culture times for embryos has a negative influence on the perinatal outcome.

Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age. There is an increasing body of evidence indicating that PCOS may have significant implications for pregnancy outcomes and long-term health of a woman and her offspring. Whether or not PCOS itself or the symptoms that coincide with PCOS, like obesity and fertility treatment, are responsible for these increased risks is a continuing matter of debate. Miscarriage rates among women with PCOS are believed to be increased compared with normal fertile women, although supporting evidence is limited. Pregnant women with PCOS experience a higher incidence of perinatal morbidity from gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia. Their babies are at an increased risk of neonatal complications, such as preterm birth and admission at a neonatal intensive care unit. Pre-pregnancy, antenatal, and intrapartum care should be aimed at reducing these risks. The use of insulin sensitizing drugs to decrease hyperinsulinemic insulin resistance has been proposed during pregnancy to reduce the risk of developing preeclampsia or gestational diabetes. Although metformin appears to be safe, there are too few data from prospective, randomized controlled trials to support treatment during pregnancy.

Pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

We review human studies on the relation between acute exposures to prenatal famine and adult physical and mental health. These studies are observational and include exposures to a famine environment by natural or man-made causes or, more commonly, from the interplay between natural and human factors. These natural experiments provide an opportunity to examine long-term outcomes after famine exposures by comparing exposed and nonexposed individuals. The studies show consistent associations between prenatal famine and adult body size, diabetes, and schizophrenia. For other measures of adult health, findings are less robust. A relation between prenatal famine and some reported epigenetic changes may provide a potential mechanism to explain specific associations. Much progress can be made if current separate studies are further analyzed with comparable definitions of exposures and outcomes and using common analytic strategies.

https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101230

Prenatal Famine and Adult Health

background: In animal models, in vitro culture of preimplantation embryos has been shown to be a risk factor for abnormal fetal outcome, including high and low birthweight. In the human, mean birthweight of singletons after in vitro fertilization (IVF) is considerably lower than after natural conception, but it is not known whether culture conditions play a role in this. methods: We compared pregnancy rates and perinatal outcomes from singleton pregnancies resulting from a total of 826 first IVF treatment cycles in which oocytes and embryos were randomly allocated to culture in either of two commercially available sequential media systems. results: When the 110 live born singletons in the Vitrolife group were compared with the 78 singletons in the Cook group, birthweight+ SEM (3453+ 53 versus 3208+ 61 g, P ¼ 0.003), and birthweight adjusted for gestational age and gender (mean z-score+ SEM: 0.13+ 0.09 versus –0.31+ 0.10, P ¼ 0.001) were both significantly higher in the Vitrolife group. When analyzed by multiple linear regression together with several other variables that could possibly affect birthweight as covariates, the type of culture medium was significantly (P ¼ 0.01) associated with birthweight.

Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns.

Study questions What are the risks of adverse outcomes in singletons born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)? Summary answer Singletons born after FET have a better perinatal outcome compared with singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI as regards low birthweight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB), but a worse perinatal outcome compared with singletons born after spontaneous conception. What is known already Previous studies have shown a worse perinatal outcome in children born after IVF in general compared with children born after spontaneous conception. In singletons born after FET, a lower rate of PTB and LBW and a higher rate of large for gestational age (LGA) compared with singletons born after fresh IVF have been shown. Study design A retrospective Nordic population-based cohort study of all singletons conceived after FET in Denmark, Norway and Sweden until December 2007 was performed. Participants/materials, setting and methods Singletons born after FET (n = 6647) were compared with a control group of singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI (n = 42 242) and singletons born after spontaneous conception (n = 288 542). Data on perinatal outcomes were obtained by linkage to the national Medical Birth Registries. Odds ratios were calculated for several perinatal outcomes and adjustments were made for maternal age, parity, year of birth, offspring sex and country of origin. Main results and the role of chance Singletons born after FET had a lower risk of LBW (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.91), PTB (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.92), very PTB (VPTB; aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95) and small for gestational age (SGA; aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.83), but a higher risk of post-term birth (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27-1.55), LGA (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.27-1.64), macrosomia (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.39-1.80) and perinatal mortality (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07-2.07) compared with singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI. Compared with children conceived after spontaneous conception, singletons born after FET had a higher risk of LBW (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.43), very LBW (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.33-2.15), PTB (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.35-1.63), VPTB (aOR 2.68, 95% CI 2.24-3.22), SGA (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35), LGA (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15-1.45), macrosomia (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15-1.45) and perinatal (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.87) neonatal (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.23-2.84) and infant mortality (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36-2.72). When analyzing trends over time, the risk of being born LGA increased over time for singletons born after FET compared with singletons born after fresh IVF and ICSI (P = 0.04). Limitations, reasons for caution As in all observational studies, the possible role of residual confounding factors and bias should be considered. In this study, we were not able to control for confounding factors, such as BMI, smoking and reason for, or length of, infertility. Wider implications of the findings Perinatal outcomes in this large population-based cohort of children born after FET from three Nordic countries compared with fresh IVF and ICSI and spontaneous conception were in agreement with the literature.

Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group

Effects of Technology or Maternal Factors on Perinatal Outcome After Assisted Fertilization: A Population-based Cohort Study

Intrauterine insemination looks like the best first choice

Assisted reproductive technologies include a range of treatment options for infertile couples, with large variations in invasiveness, side effects, and costs. With intrauterine insemination, fertilisation takes place inside the female genital tract; with in vitro fertilisation (IVF), fertilisation occurs in a culture dish. From a couple’s perspective, intrauterine insemination is a less invasive and less stressful procedure than IVF. However, lower success rates per treatment cycle and an increased risk of twin pregnancies have made fertility experts reluctant to offer intrauterine insemination as a first line treatment.

A linked study by Bensdorp and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.g7771) sheds new light on the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and also on the view that higher rates of multiple pregnancies after insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation are inevitable.1 They conducted a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility attending 17 fertility clinics in the Netherlands. Participants were randomised into three groups. Couples in one group had three cycles of IVF with single embryo transfer (plus surplus cryopreserved embryos), couples in a second group had six cycles of IVF in …

Which treatment option for couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility

82: Risk of cancer in children and young adults born after ART: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group

Donor sperm is widely used in infertility treatments. The purpose of the study was to investigate, whether use of donor sperm in intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments affect maternal and perinatal risks compared with spontaneously conceived pregnancies or use of partner sperm in IUI, IVF or ICSI. We provide a systematic review and meta-analyses on the most clinically relevant obstetric and perinatal outcomes after use of donor sperm compared with partner sperm: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, low birth weight, and preterm birth. Our meta-analyses showed an increased risk for preeclampsia (pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.77, 95% CI 1.26-2.48) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pooled aOR 1.55, 95%, CI 1.20-2.00) in pregnancies resulting from IUI with donor sperm compared with IUI with partner sperm. No increased risk was seen for low birth weight or preterm birth after the use of donor sperm in IUI compared with the use of partner sperm in IUI. Subgroup analysis for singletons only did not change these results. The meta-analysis on low birth weight showed a lower risk after in IVF with donor sperm compared with IVF with partner sperm (pooled aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.94). For hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia and preterm birth, no difference was found between IVF with donor sperm vs. partner sperm. Patients need to be informed about the moderately increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preeclampsia in pregnancies after IUI with donor sperm. 

L.B. Romundstad

Papers

Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of Technology or Maternal Factors on Perinatal Outcome After Assisted Fertilization: A Population-based Cohort Study

Which treatment option for couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility

82: Risk of cancer in children and young adults born after ART: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group

Obstetric and perinatal risks after the use of donor sperm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.