Resena de la obra de Don A. Dillman, Jolene D. Smyth y Leah Melani Christian: Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7287796.pdf

Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method: reseña

Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe.

william cronon the trouble with wilderness or getting the trouble with wilderness or getting back to the wrong nature by william cronon print formatted version pdf in william cronon ed uncommon ground rethinking, jesse and frank james new world encyclopedia jesse woodson james was born in clay county missouri near the site of present day kearney his father robert james was a farmer and baptist minister, conqu te de l ouest wikip dia la conqu te de l ouest est le processus de colonisation par des populations essentiellement d origine europ enne et le gouvernement des tats unis au xix e, from inquiry to academic writing pdf free download this page intentionally left blank from inquiry to academic writing a text and reader aronson11e fm aronson11e fm 4

Gunfighter Nation: The Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America

Since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ecosystem service science has made much progress in framing core concepts and approaches, but there is still debate around the notion of cultural services, and a growing consensus that ecosystem use and ecosystem service use should be clearly differentiated. Part of the debate resides in the fact that the most significant sources of conflict around natural resource management arise from the multiple managements (uses) of ecosystems, rather than from the multiple uses of ecosystem services.

If the ecosystem approach or the ecosystem service paradigm are to be implemented at national levels, there is an urgent need to disentangle what are often semantic issues, revise the notion of cultural services, and more broadly, practically define the less tangible ecosystem services on which we depend. This is a critical step to identifying suitable ways to manage trade-offs and promote adaptive management.

Here we briefly review the problems associated with defining and quantifying cultural ecosystem services and suggest there could be merit in discarding this term for the simpler non-material ecosystem services. We also discuss the challenges in valuing the invaluable, and suggest that if we are to keep ecosystem service definition focused on the beneficiary, we need to further classify these challenging services, for example by differentiating services to individuals from services to communities. Also, we suggest that focussing on ecosystem service change rather than simply service delivery, and identifying common boundaries relevant for both people and ecosystems, would help meet some of these challenges.

The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits

Review of: Gunfighter Nation: The Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America. Slotkin, Richard.

https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9798&context=annals-of-iowa

Gunfighter Nation: the Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America

The hope for creating widespread change in social values has endured among conservation professionals since early calls by Aldo Leopold for a "land ethic." However, there has been little serious attention in conservation to the fields of investigation that address values, how they are formed, and how they change. We introduce a social-ecological systems conceptual approach in which values are seen not only as motivational goals people hold but also as ideas that are deeply embedded in society's material culture, collective behaviors, traditions, and institutions. Values define and bind groups, organizations, and societies; serve an adaptive role; and are typically stable across generations. When abrupt value changes occur, they are in response to substantial alterations in the social-ecological context. Such changes build on prior value structures and do not result in complete replacement. Given this understanding of values, we conclude that deliberate efforts to orchestrate value shifts for conservation are unlikely to be effective. Instead, there is an urgent need for research on values with a multilevel and dynamic view that can inform innovative conservation strategies for working within existing value structures. New directions facilitated by a systems approach will enhance understanding of the role values play in shaping conservation challenges and improve management of the human component of conservation.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cobi.12855

Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation.

Values, trust, and cultural backlash in conservation governance: The case of wildlife management in the United States

We introduced a multilevel model of value shift to describe the changing social context of wildlife conservation. Our model depicts how cultural-level processes driven by modernization (e.g., increased wealth, education, and urbanization) affect changes in individual-level cognition that prompt a shift from domination to mutualism wildlife values. Domination values promote beliefs that wildlife should be used primarily to benefit humans, whereas mutualism values adopt a view that wildlife are part of one's social network and worthy of care and compassion. Such shifts create emergent effects (e.g., new interest groups) and challenges to wildlife management organizations (e.g., increased conflict) and dramatically alter the sociopolitical context of conservation decisions. Although this model is likely applicable to many modernized countries, we tested it with data from a 2017-2018 nationwide survey (mail and email panel) of 43,949 residents in the United States. We conducted hierarchical linear modeling and correlational analysis to examine relationships. Modernization variables had strong state-level effects on domination and mutualism. Higher levels of education, income, and urbanization were associated with higher percentages of mutualists and lower percentages of traditionalists, who have strong domination values. Values affected attitudes toward wildlife management challenges; for example, states with higher proportions of mutualists were less supportive of lethal control of wolves (Canis lupus) and had lower percentages of active hunters, who represent the traditional clientele of state wildlife agencies in the United States. We contend that agencies will need to embrace new strategies to engage and represent a growing segment of the public with mutualism values. Our model merits testing for application in other countries.

https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cobi.13493

Leeann Sullivan

Papers

Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation.

Values, trust, and cultural backlash in conservation governance: The case of wildlife management in the United States

The changing sociocultural context of wildlife conservation.

For US Wildlife Management, Social Science Needed Now More Than Ever

Revisiting the challenge of intentional value shift: reply to Ives and Fischer