A number of PCR-based techniques can be used to detect polymorphisms in plants. For their wide-scale usage in germplasm characterisation and breeding it is important that these marker technologies can be exchanged between laboratories, which in turn requires that they can be standardised to yield reproducible results, so that direct collation and comparison of the data are possible. This article describes a network experiment involving several European laboratories, in which the reproducibility of three popular molecular marker techniques was examined: random-amplified fragment length polymorphism (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and sequence-tagged microsatellites (SSR). For each technique, an optimal system was chosen, which had been standardised and routinely used by one laboratory. This system (genetic screening package) was distributed to different participating laboratories in the network and the results obtained compared with those of the original sender. Different experiences were gained in this exchange experiment with the different techniques. RAPDs proved difficult to reproduce. For AFLPs, a single-band difference was observed in one track, whilst SSR alleles were amplified by all laboratories, but small differences in their sizing were obtained.

Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories

Applications of genome mapping and marker-assisted selection (MAS) in crop improvement are reviewed. The following aspects are considered: a comparison of the choice of markers available for the generation of linkage maps (including amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP); restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP); randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeats (SSR)); quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis; use of molecular markers in the exploitation of hybrid vigour; physical genome mapping; map-based cloning and transposon tagging of agriculturally important genes; synteny in cereal genomes; and the use of MAS in breeding for disease and pest resistance.

Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants

We investigated the usefulness of a novel DNA fingerprinting technique, AFLP, which is based on the selective amplification of genomic restriction fragments by PCR, to differentiate bacterial strains at the subgeneric level. In total, 147 bacterial strains were subjected to AFLP fingerprinting: 36 Xanthomonas strains, including 23 pathovars of Xanthomonas axonopodis and six pathovars of Xanthomonas vasicola, one strain of Stenotrophomonas, 90 genotypically characterized strains comprising all 14 hybridization groups currently described in the genus Aeromonas, and four strains of each of the genera Clostridium, Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Vibrio. Depending on the genus, total genomic DNA of each bacterium was digested with a particular combination of two restriction endonucleases and the resulting fragments were ligated to restriction halfsite-specific adaptors. These adaptors served as primer-binding sites allowing the fragments to be amplified by selective PCR primers that extend beyond the adaptor and restriction site sequences. Following electrophoretic separation on 5% (w/v) polyacrylamide/8.3 M urea, amplified products could be visualized by autoradiography because one of the selective primers was radioactively labelled. The resulting banding patterns, containing approximately 30-50 visualized PCR products in the size range 80-550 bp, were captured by a high-resolution densitoscanner and further processed for computer-assisted analysis to determine band-based similarity coefficients. This study reveals extensive evidence for the applicability of AFLP in bacterial taxonomy through comparison of the newly obtained data with results previously obtained by well-established genotypic and chemotaxonomic methods such as DNA-DNA hybridization and cellular fatty acid analysis. In addition, this study clearly demonstrates the superior discriminative power of AFLP towards the differentiation of highly related bacterial strains that belong to the same species or even biovar (i.e. to characterize strains at the infrasubspecific level), highlighting the potential of this novel fingerprinting method in epidemiological and evolutionary studies.

/pdf/evaluation-of-the-dna-fingerprinting-method-aflp-as-a-new-1chpiz55ib.pdf

Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy

PREFACE REPETITIVE DNA: AN IMPORTANT SOURCE OF VARIATION IN EUKARYOTIC GENOMES Categories of DNA Sequence Mutations Tandem-Repetitive DNA: The Biology of Mini- and Microsatellites Minisatellites Microsatellites Transposable Elements Class I Transposons Class II Transposons Unclassified Transposons Transposons and Genome Evolution Transposons as Molecular Markers DETECTING DNA VARIATION BY MOLECULAR MARKERS Properties of Molecular Markers Traditional Marker Systems Protein Markers and Allozymes DNA Sequencing Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) Analysis The PCR Generation: Molecular Markers Based on In Vitro DNA Amplification Principle of the PCR Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences PCR with Arbitrary Primers: RAPD and Its Variants Microsatellites Inter-Repeat PCR DNA Profiling of Genic Regions: Resistance Gene Analog Polymorphism, Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism, and Target Region Amplification Polymorphism Hybridization of Microsatellites to RAPD and MP-PCR Products AFLP Analysis and Its Variants Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism Analysis and Related Techniques Miscellaneous Techniques LABORATORY EQUIPMENT METHODOLOGY Safety Precautions Isolation, Purification, and Quantitation of Plant DNA Collection and Preservation of Plant Tissue in the Field Plant DNA Extraction: General Considerations CTAB Protocol I CTAB Protocol II SDS-Potassium Acetate Protocol DNA Preparation via Nuclei Quantitation of DNA Basic Molecular Techniques Restriction of DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction DNA Sequencing Agarose Gel Electrophoresis PAA Gel Electrophoresis Detection of DNA in Gels Gel Drying Southern Blotting Generation of Radiolabeled Probes, Primers, and PCR Products Blot Hybridization Signal Detection PCR with Arbitrary Primers Standard RAPD Protocol Influence of Reaction Conditions and Components Modifications Microsatellite-Primed PCR Standard Protocol of Microsatellite-Primed PCR Influence of Reaction Conditions and Components Modifications PCR and Hybridization: Combinatory Techniques Assessing the Genomic Copy Number of PCR Amplicons Testing the Homology of Comigrating Bands Random Amplified Polymorphic Microsatellites Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Standard AFLP Protocol Using Radioisotopes AFLP Protocol Using Fluorescence-Labeled Primers Selective Amplification of Microsatellite Polymorphic Loci and Microsatellite AFLP Protocols Technical Aspects and Modifications Robustness and Reproducibility Generation and Analysis of Microsatellite Markers Microsatellite Analysis Using Radioisotopes Microsatellite Analysis Using Fluorochromes Technical Aspects and Modifications Generating Microsatellite Markers Without Cloning Microsatellite Cloning CAPS Analysis of cpDNA and mtDNA Standard CAPS Protocol Choice of CAPS Primers EVALUATION OF MOLECULAR MARKER DATA Robustness and Reproducibility Reliability Band Homology Band Linkage and Neutrality Fragment Sizing and Matching General Precautions Equipment Multilocus vs. Single-Locus Approaches Multilocus Markers Single-Locus Markers and Polyploids Band Sharing and Genetic Distances Coefficients of Similarity Dissimilarity Coefficients and Genetic Distances Identity and Uniqueness Clonal Structure Ordination, Clustering, and Dendrograms Ordination Techniques Construction of Dendrograms Population Genetic Analysis Measures of Variation Genetic Differentiation between Populations Genetic Distances between Populations Inbreeding Coefficient and Mating Systems Estimation of Relatedness and Paternity Testing Migration and Hybridization Gene Flow, Isolation-by-Distance, and Spatial Structure Phylogeography and Nested Clade Analysis Statistical Testing of Hypotheses: Analytical and Computational Methods APPLICATIONS OF DNA FINGERPRINTING IN PLANT SCIENCES A Brief History of DNA Fingerprinting Minisatellite and Oligonucleotide DNA Probes Detect Genetic Variation PCR-Based Methods Enter the Stage Microsatellite DNA Analyses Yield Codominant Markers Universal Organellar DNA Primers Produce Uniparental Markers Genotype Identification Individual-Specific DNA Fingerprints Cultivar Identification In Vitro-Propagated Plant Material and Somaclonal Variation Sports and Other Mutants Genetic Diversity Variation and Relatedness among Cultivars Analysis of Population Genetic Diversity and Its Distribution Hybridization and Introgression Plant Conservation Germplasm Characterization and Preservation Plant Taxonomy and Systematics Taxonomic Relationships Revealed by Multilocus DNA Methods Microsatellite Markers in Taxonomic Studies Taxonomic Consequences from DNA Profiling Data Phylogeography Phylogeography Based on cpDNA Phylogeography Based on Nuclear Genes LINKAGE ANALYSIS AND GENETIC MAPS Generating High-Density Genetic Maps Selection of Parent Plants Mapping Population Linkage Analysis The Genetic Map Cytogenetic Maps Genetic vs. Physical Maps Synteny: The Comparative Analysis of Genomes Marker-Assisted Selection Molecular Markers and Positional Cloning WHICH MARKER FOR WHAT PURPOSE: A COMPARISON Morphological Characters and Allozymes vs. DNA Markers Different Kinds of DNA Markers Discriminatory Power Genetic Distances Within- and Among-Population Variation Gene Tagging and Genetic Linkage Mapping Costs Conclusions FUTURE PROSPECTS: SNIPS AND CHIPS FOR DNA AND RNA PROFILING Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms What Is a SNiP SNP Discovery DNA Microarrays Expression Profiling and Expression Markers APPENDIX 1: PLANT DNA ISOLATION PROTOCOLS APPENDIX 2: SUPPLIERS AND SELLERS OF REAGENTS AND EQUIPMENT APPENDIX 3: COMPUTER PROGRAMS DEALING WITH THE EVALUATION OF DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION AND MOLECULAR MARKER DATA APPENDIX 4: WEB PAGES OF INTEREST REFERENCES INDEX

DNA fingerprinting in plants: principles, methods, and applications

method. The major disadvantages of both of these techniques are the high number of untypeable strains and the time-consuming and technically demanding requirements of the techniques. Production and quality control of antiserum reagents for serotyping schemes are costly; consequently, these reagents are not widely available. A recently developed scheme (23) based on HS antigens in which modified antibody production and antigen detection techniques are used may be an improvement for routine use, but this scheme does not solve the problem of restricted reagent availability or the problem of the high level of nontypeability. Because of such problems, the value of serotyping techniques for national and global epidemiological studies has been restricted. Thus, there is a well-recognized need for alternative subtyping schemes. Recently, molecular subtyping methods have been developed. The major advantage of genotyping techniques is that potentially they could be universally available. Some of these techniques, like ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and flagellin typing (fla typing), are already in use in a number of laboratories (62). In this review we describe the technologies currently available for genotypic subtyping of Campylobacter spp., discuss the advantages and problems of each technique, and indicate the current value of each method.

https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/66/1/1.full.pdf

Genotyping of Campylobacter spp.

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis appears to offer a cost- and time-effective alternative to restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. However, concerns about the ability to compare RAPD results from one laboratory to another have not been addressed effectively. DNA fragments that were amplified by five primers and shown to be reproducibly polymorphic between two oat cultivars (within the Ottawa laboratory) were tested in six other laboratories in North America. Four of the six participants amplified very few or no fragments using the Ottawa protocol. These same participants were able to generate a considerable number of amplified fragments by using their own protocols. The reproducibility of results among laboratories was affected by two factors. First, different laboratories amplified different size ranges of DNA fragments, and, consequently, small and large polymorphic fragments were not always reproduced. Second, although reproducible results were obtained with four of the primers, reproducible results were not obtained with the fifth primer, using the same reaction conditions. It is suggested that if the overall temperature profiles (especially the annealing temperature) inside the tubes are identical among the laboratories, then RAPD fragments are likely to be reproducible.

/pdf/reproducibility-of-random-amplified-polymorphic-dna-rapd-1ue0em1cy1.pdf

Les Domier

Papers

Reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis among laboratories