L
Lilia Zhurakhovska
Researcher at Max Planck Society
Publications - 21
Citations - 188
Lilia Zhurakhovska is an academic researcher from Max Planck Society. The author has contributed to research in topics: Prisoner's dilemma & Dilemma. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 19 publications receiving 164 citations. Previous affiliations of Lilia Zhurakhovska include University of Duisburg-Essen.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
When is the Risk of Cooperation Worth Taking? The Prisoner’s Dilemma as a Game of Multiple Motives
TL;DR: In this article, a prisoner's dilemma is modeled as a symmetric symmetric game, where participants frequently cooperate in the field and in the lab, despite the fact that the situation can be modelled as a simultaneous, symmetric prisoner dilemma.
Journal ArticleDOI
When is the Risk of Cooperation Worth Taking? The Prisoner’s Dilemma as a Game of Multiple Motives
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explain the degree of cooperation by a combination of four motives: efficiency, conditional cooperation, fear and greed, and explain why players cooperate in the prisoner's dilemma with personality.
Journal ArticleDOI
Promoting Truthful Communication Through Ex-Post Disclosure
TL;DR: The authors found that ex-post disclosure almost doubled the incidence of truth-telling, even in the absence of financial consequences, and that the effect of expost disclosure on truthful communication is present for males, but not for females.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conditional Cooperation With Negative Externalities – An Experiment
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that harm on outsiders significantly reduces conditional cooperation of insiders, with guilt being most pronounced if the active insiders not only inflict harm on the outsider but increase their own payoff at the expense of the outsider.
Journal ArticleDOI
You Are in Charge: Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office
TL;DR: The authors found that when given an opportunity to announce an explicit policy, judges become less sensitive to the objective degree of reproach and more sensitive to their personal social value orientation, suggesting that the effect is not driven by anger or sympathy with the victims but follows from the office motive: the desire to fulfill the expectations that come with an assigned task.