Showing papers by "Lluís Puig published in 2009"

Scalp psoriasis: European consensus on grading and treatment algorithm

Abstract: The scalp is a common site of involvement of psoriasis and, for many patients, is a challenging aspect of their disease. This can be attributed not only to the scaling, itching and cosmetic embarrassment that go with scalp psoriasis, but also to the fact that the scalp skin is relatively inaccessible, making topical therapies difficult to apply. The proximity of sensitive facial skin can also limit the use of potentially irritating topical treatments. Nevertheless, the specific challenges of scalp psoriasis are often neglected by treatment guidelines. This paper summarizes the discussions that took place at an international conference of experts convened in Geneva, Switzerland, in March 2008. The objective of the meeting was to review the available treatments for scalp psoriasis in terms of efficacy, safety, convenience, and the implications for patient compliance with treatment. In addition, definitions of mild, moderate and severe scalp psoriasis were agreed. This paper presents a treatment algorithm that includes recommendations for patients in all three categories. It considers the role of potent topical corticosteroids, vitamin D3 derivatives, salicylic acid preparations, and photo- and radiotherapy, as well as systemic therapies, including newer biological agents, for patients with widespread psoriasis with scalp involvement. Data from clinical trials indicate that a potent topical corticosteroid in a short-contact formulation is the most appropriate treatment for most patients with scalp psoriasis.

Efalizumab treatment of psoriasis vulgaris: a cohort study in outpatient clinical practice.

Abstract: Summary Background. Efalizumab is approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who fail to respond to, have a contraindication for, or cannot tolerate other systemic therapies. Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of efalizumab treatment in daily practice at a dermatology department in a teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Methods. A cohort study was carried out for patients treated with efalizumab for at least 3 months between May 2005 and July 2007. In total, 31 patients [21 men, 10 women; mean psoriasis and severity index (PASI) 12.9] were treated with efalizumab. Data were collected prospectively, including PASI, and recorded at the start of treatment and at follow-up visits with a frequency of at least every 3 months. Results. At the end of the study period, efalizumab treatment was ongoing in 18 of the 31 patients (58.1%), and 7 of these patients had been treated for ≥ 24 months. At week 12, 67.7% of the patients treated with efalizumab had achieved an improvement of 50% in PASI (PASI 50), 41.9% reached PASI 75, and 16.1% reached PASI 90 (intention to treat and as-treated analyses). In all, 19 patients (61.3%) received treatment for ≥ 24 weeks. At week 24, 89.5% of these patients reached PASI 75, and 26.3% reached PASI 90 (as-treated analysis). During efalizumab treatment, mainly mild adverse effects were reported, including transient papular or circinate exacerbations of psoriasis, which were seen in five patients (16.1%). Rebounds (defined as PASI ≥ 125% of baseline, leading to erythroderma in two patients) occurred in 7/31 patients (22.6%); this occurred while on treatment in 5/11 nonresponding patients (45.5%) and after discontinuation of treatment in 2/20 patients with good response (10.0%). Conclusion. Efalizumab is an effective and safe treatment for psoriasis in most patients of a high need population in routine practice, and provides maintained improvement in ‘responders’. Combination treatment was transiently used in 48.4% of patients to optimize therapeutic results. Special consideration must be given to possible rebound in patients with an inadequate response or after discontinuation of treatment.

Identifying the biologic closest to the ideal to treat chronic plaque psoriasis in different clinical scenarios: using a pilot multi-attribute decision model as a decision-support aid.

Abstract: Objective:Multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) models evaluate competing solutions for complex problems to identify the closest fit to the ideal solution. MADM models may assist dermatologists when selecting between biologics for plaque psoriasis. Here, is described the development of a pilot model to identify the preferred biologic from the dermatologist's perspective.Research design and methods:A group of European dermatologists were surveyed to identify treatment attributes they consider when prescribing a biologic. The relative importance of each was determined by allocation of 100 importance points in the context of seven case vignettes, reflecting the breadth of disease encountered in dermatological practice. Biologic performance was rated anonymously on a scale of 1–10, scores entered into a MADM matrix, and TOPSIS (Technique for Ordered Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution) analysis applied to identify the biologic closest to the hypothetical ideal.Results:Long-term efficacy an...