https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(09)61124-7.pdf

The public health effect of economic crises and alternative policy responses in Europe: an empirical analysis

Using a unique dataset of the Euro area and the U.S. bank lending standards, we find that low (monetary policy) short-term interest rates soften standards, for household and corporate loans. This softening – especially for mortgages – is amplified by securitization activity, weak supervision for bank capital and too low for too long monetary policy rates. Conversely, low long-term interest rates do not soften lending standards. Finally, countries with softer lending standards before the crisis related to negative Taylor-rule residuals experienced a worse economic performance afterwards. These results help shed light on the origins of the crisis and have important policy implications.

Bank Risk-Taking, Securitization, Supervision and Low Interest Rates: Evidence from the Euro Area and the U.S. Lending Standards

This paper documents producer price setting in 6 countries of the euro area: Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Belgium and Portugal. It collects evidence from available studies on each of those countries and also provides new evidence. These studies use monthly producer price data. The following five stylised facts emerge consistently across countries. First, producer prices change infrequently: each month around 21% of prices change. Second, there is substantial cross-sector heterogeneity in the frequency of price changes: prices change very often in the energy sector, less often in food and intermediate goods and least often in non-durable non-food and durable goods. Third, countries have a similar ranking of industries in terms of frequency of price changes. Fourth, there is no evidence of downward nominal rigidity: price changes are for about 45% decreases and 55% increases. Fifth, price changes are sizeable compared to the inflation rate. The paper also examines the factors driving producer price changes. It finds that costs structure, competition, seasonality, inflation and attractive pricing all play a role in driving producer price changes. In addition producer prices tend to be more flexible than consumer prices.

/pdf/price-setting-in-the-euro-area-some-stylised-facts-from-z2ty68w03u.pdf

Price Setting in the Euro Area : Some Stylised Facts from Individual Producer Price Data

/pdf/sticky-prices-in-the-euro-area-a-summary-of-new-micro-aip9uw6iuz.pdf

Sticky prices in the euro area: a summary of new micro

https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/19010/1/cesifo1_wp1546.pdf

Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries: A re-examination

https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/perez-quiros.pdf

Are European business cycles close enough to be just one

This paper analyzes if each European country presents business cycles that are similar enough to validate what some authors call the European cycle. Contrary to the majority of papers on business cycles, we concentrate on the appearance of the cycle, not on the synchronization. We provide a robust methodology for dating and characterizing business cycles and their phases and adopt the model-based cluster analysis to test the existence of an unique cluster (a common cycle) against more than one. We find evidence against a common cycle. Finally, we find no clear relation between similarities in business cycle appearance and synchronization across countries.

Do european business cycles look like one

http://www.um.es/econometria/Maximo/articulos/charact.pdf

Do European business cycles look like one

We propose a comprehensive methodology to characterize the business cycle comovements across European economies and some industrialized countries, always trying to 'let the data speak'. Out of this framework, we propose a novel method to show that there is no 'Euro economy' that acts as an attractor to the other economies of the area. We show that the relative comovements across EU economies are prior to the establishment of the Monetary Union. We are able to explain an important proportion of the distances across their business cycles using macro-variables related to the structure of the economy, to the directions of trade, and to the size of the public sector. Finally, we show that the distances across countries that belong to the European Union are smaller than the distances across newcomers.

Are European Business Cycles Close Enough to be Just One

There is a stark contrast between the recent evolution of labor productivity (and TFP) in the US and EU countries. In the US it accelerated around the mid-1990s and there is evidence of reversion to a high-growth regime. In some EU countries, while employment-population ratios started to rise after a period of stagnant employment, labor productivity (and TFP) decelerated. In this paper we apply univariate and multivariate methods, that have been used to detect structural breaks in productivity growth in the US economy, to EU data to confirm the existence of a significant permanent shift to lower productivity growth in some European countries around the mid-1990s. We find a structural break in mean labour productivity growth in the US around the mid-1990s (towards higher growth), in Continental Europe around the early 1990s (towards lower growth) and no evidence of structural breaks in the UK.

/pdf/structural-breaks-in-labor-productivity-growth-the-united-5ff02xlrxo.pdf

Lorena Saiz

Papers

Are European business cycles close enough to be just one

Do european business cycles look like one

Do European business cycles look like one

Are European Business Cycles Close Enough to be Just One

Structural breaks in labor productivity growth: the united states vs. the european union