M. W. Van Liew

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present guidelines for watershed model evaluation based on the review results and project-specific considerations, including single-event simulation, quality and quantity of measured data, model calibration procedure, evaluation time step, and project scope and magnitude.

TL;DR: The SWAT-CUP tool as discussed by the authors is a semi-distributed river basin model that requires a large number of input parameters, which complicates model parameterization and calibration, and is used to provide statistics for goodness-of-fit.

TL;DR: In this paper, the performance of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and the HydrologicSimulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) continuous simulation models was compared on eight nested agricultural watersheds within the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed (LWREW) and two adjacent watersheds adjacent to the LWREW within southwestern Oklahoma.

TL;DR: In this paper, an investigation was conducted to evaluate strengths and limitations of manual calibration and the existing autocalibration tool in the watershed-scale model referred to as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT).

TL;DR: In this article, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) parameter sensitivity and autocalibration module was tested on two northern and three southern USDA-ARS experimental watersheds.