scispace - formally typeset
M

Maria Deprez

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  65
Citations -  665

Maria Deprez is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 50 publications receiving 327 citations. Previous affiliations of Maria Deprez include St Thomas' Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Respiration resolved imaging with continuous stable state 2D acquisition using linear frequency SWEEP.

TL;DR: To investigate the potential of continuous radiofrequency (RF) shifting (SWEEP) as a technique for creating densely sampled data while maintaining a stable signal state for dynamic imaging.
Posted ContentDOI

3D UNet with GAN discriminator for robust localisation of the fetal brain and trunk in MRI with partial coverage of the fetal body

TL;DR: In this article, a multi-label 3D UNet with a GAN discriminator was proposed to localize both fetal brain and trunk in fetal MRI stacks. But the proposed method is robust for datasets with both full and partial coverage of the fetal body.
Book ChapterDOI

A Novel Spatial-Angular Domain Regularisation Approach for Restoration of Diffusion MRI

TL;DR: This paper shows that the novel regularization method outperforms widely used and recent DWI denoising algorithms and can be successfully applied to the super-resolution reconstruction of high-resolution volume from thick-slice data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment of the fetal thymus gland: Comparing MRI-acquired thymus volumes with 2D ultrasound measurements

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated how accurately 2D ultrasound-derived measurements of the fetal thymus reflect the 3D volume of the gland derived from motion corrected MRI images.
Book ChapterDOI

Harmonised Segmentation of Neonatal Brain MRI: A Domain Adaptation Approach

TL;DR: This work aims to predict tissue segmentation maps on an unseen dataset, which has both different acquisition parameters and population bias when compared to the authors' training data by investigating two unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) techniques and comparing the two methods with a baseline fully-supervised segmentation network.