scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark D. Johnson

Researcher at University of Massachusetts Medical School

Publications -  301
Citations -  18425

Mark D. Johnson is an academic researcher from University of Massachusetts Medical School. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Gene. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 289 publications receiving 16103 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark D. Johnson include National Institutes of Health & Georgetown University Medical Center.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural and vibrational study of the negative thermal expansion in liquid As2Te3

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an experimental and theoretical study of liquid atoms in a negative thermal expansion (NTE) in a 250 K range above the melting temperature of the liquid, showing an increase in the coordination numbers and a symmetrization of the first neighbors shell around atoms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bax regulates c-Myc-induced mammary tumour apoptosis but not proliferation in MMTV-c-myc transgenic mice

TL;DR: It is suggested that in contrast to c-Myc-induced lymphomagenesis, mammary tumorigenesis induced by deregulated c-myc expression requires some amount of Bax expression.
Journal Article

Heterologous desensitization of the rat tail artery contraction and inositol phosphate accumulation after in vitro exposure to phenylephrine is mediated by decreased levels of Galphaq and Galphai.

TL;DR: Data show that the reduced transmembrane signaling for the alpha1AR in tail artery after in vitro PE exposure is associated with decreases in Galphaq and Galphai protein levels, which appears to mediate the loss of function of alpha2AR and perhaps of other G protein-coupled receptors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigation of interfraction variations of MammoSite balloon applicator in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of partial breast irradiation.

TL;DR: The interfraction variations were patient specific and fraction dependent and although the average interfraction dose variations for the target and organs at risk were not clinically significant, the maximum variations could be clinically significant.