Mark J. King

TL;DR: In this paper, a human-machine framework is proposed to isolate the components and various interactions associated with mobile phone distracted driving, and the proposed framework specifies the impacts of mobile phone distraction as an inter-related system of outcomes such as speed selection, lane deviations and crashes; human car controls such as steering control and brake pedal use and human-environment interactions such as visual scanning and navigation.

TL;DR: Crossing against the lights and crossing close to the lights both exhibited a crash risk per crossing event approximately eight times that of legal crossing at signalised intersections, which would assist in setting a rationale for enforcement and priorities for public education.

TL;DR: In this paper, a study questionnaire was developed to investigate the relationship between risky driving and Akers' social learning theory, social identity theory, and thrill seeking variables, and the questionnaire was completed by 165 participants (105 women, 60 men) residing in south-east Queensland, Australia.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists, and demonstrated that there are high rates of cyclist-vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision.

TL;DR: Investigating speed adaptation of distracted drivers under varying road infrastructure and traffic complexity conditions indicated that complex road environments like urbanization, car-following situations along suburban roads, and curved road alignment significantly influenced speed adaptation behaviour.