scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark L. Messonnier

Researcher at National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases

Publications -  22
Citations -  2475

Mark L. Messonnier is an academic researcher from National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. The author has contributed to research in topics: Vaccination & Population. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 22 publications receiving 2283 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: Measuring disease burden and costs

TL;DR: The results highlight the enormous annual burden of influenza in the US, with hospitalization costs and lost productivity from missed work days and lost lives comprise the bulk of the economic burden.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic Evaluation of the Routine Childhood Immunization Program in the United States, 2009

TL;DR: From both direct cost and societal perspectives, vaccinating children as recommended with these vaccines results in substantial cost savings, and routine childhood immunization among members of the 2009 US birth cohort will prevent ∼42 000 early deaths and 20 million cases of disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic evaluation of the 7-vaccine routine childhood immunization schedule in the United States, 2001

TL;DR: Routine childhood immunization with the 7 vaccines was cost saving from the direct cost and societal perspectives, with net savings of 9.9 billion dollars and 43.3 billion dollars, respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mothers’ preferences and willingness to pay for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus

TL;DR: It is estimated that mean maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for current HPV vaccine technology ranges between $560 and $660, and mothers strongly valued greater cervical cancer efficacy, with 100% protection against cervical cancers the most desired feature overall.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines.

TL;DR: Responses were willing to pay larger amounts to avoid increased risk of minor adverse events and to increase community-level immunization coverage than to avoid injections, which should be taken into account when determining the risks and benefits of combination vaccines.