scispace - formally typeset
M

Martin J. Ikeda

Researcher at University of Pennsylvania

Publications -  6
Citations -  793

Martin J. Ikeda is an academic researcher from University of Pennsylvania. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rating scale & Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 6 publications receiving 753 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Parent Ratings of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: Factor Structure and Normative Data

TL;DR: In this article, a parent rating scale containing the 18 symptoms of ADHD was examined in a sample of 4666 participants ranging in age from 4 to 20 years old who attended kindergarten through 12th grade in 22 school districts across the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability and Validity of Parent and Teacher Ratings of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms:

TL;DR: The reliability and criterion-related validity of the Home and School versions of the AD/HD Rating Scale-IV were evaluated in a non-referred sample of 71 students as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Using Multiple Informants: The Incremental Utility of Combining Teacher with Parent Reports.

TL;DR: In this article, a sample of students referred to a school-based Pupil Assistance Committee, the Inattention and Hyperactivity-impulsivity factors of the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale-IV were used to predict diagnostic status, determined by a parent-reported diagnostic interview and teacher rating scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Clinical Utility of Behavior Rating Scales: Comments on the Diagnostic Assessment of ADHD.

TL;DR: In this paper, a multiple stage procedure, involving one or more levels of screening prior to conducting a diagnostic assessment, was recommended as a strategy to increase diagnostic accuracy in a time and cost-efficient manner.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the Quality and Responsiveness of Reading Interventions Developed Through Problem Solving

TL;DR: This paper evaluated 32 reading intervention cases, and found that quality interventions, ambitious goals, and formative progress learning positively impact student achievement, but they did not evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.