Meghan Bruce Kumar

TL;DR: There is potential for integrating supportive group supervision models in CHW programmes and a combination of group with individual or peer supervision, preferably accompanied with methods that assess CHW performance and corresponding feedback systems, could yield improved motivation and performance.

TL;DR: A framework, list of indicators, and measurement considerations for monitoring CHW performance in low- and middle-income countries and adoption of the proposed framework and associated indicators by CHW program implementors may improve programmatic effectiveness, strengthen their accountability to national community health systems, drive programmatic quality improvement, and plausibly improve the impact of these programs.

TL;DR: It is found that CHWs experienced tensions at the interface between the formal health system and the communities they served, mediated by the social and cultural expectations of their role, and affected data quality in both contexts.

TL;DR: This investigation investigated the factors which influenced the process of QI based on experience of maternal health QI teams in three Puskesmas in Cianjur district, West Java province, Indonesia and found four main factors contributed to the process.

TL;DR: Key lessons and reflections from both QRN experiences on how to conduct trustworthy qualitative research across different contexts are distils, describing how credibility, dependability, confirmability and transferability can be enhanced and share good practices to be considered by other researchers.