M
Michael A. Campion
Researcher at Purdue University
Publications - 144
Citations - 18938
Michael A. Campion is an academic researcher from Purdue University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Job design & Job performance. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 141 publications receiving 17570 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael A. Campion include North Carolina State University & Saint Petersburg State University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types.
TL;DR: In this article, a 30-item structured interview, with 15 future and 15 past questions, and a battery of nine test were correlated with job performance in a sample of 70 pulp mill employees.
Journal ArticleDOI
Follow-up and extension of the interdisciplinary costs and benefits of enlarged jobs.
TL;DR: This article provided a 2-year follow-up, including pretest-posttest and posttest-only quasi experiments, of M. A. Campion and C. L. McClelland's (1991) interdisciplinary evaluation of costs and benefits of a job enlargement intervention.
Journal ArticleDOI
Development and Field Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Measure of Job Design
TL;DR: CAMPION as discussed by the authors developed a taxonomy of job design approaches from literature of different disciplines: (a) a motivational approach from organizational psychology; (b) a mechanistic approach from classic industrial engineering; (c) a biological approach from work physiology and biomechanics; and (d) a perceptual/motor approach from experimental psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Model of Faking Likelihood in the Employment Interview.
TL;DR: The authors proposed a model of faking during an employment interview and developed 19 testable propositions to guide future research, arguing that faking is a function of capacity, willingness, and opportunity to fake.
Journal ArticleDOI
Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study.
TL;DR: The authors found that information moderated the relationship between outcome favorability and test-taking self-efficacy among African Americans but not among Whites, and that information was not related to the behavioral measures.