scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael A. Xenos

Researcher at University of Wisconsin-Madison

Publications -  117
Citations -  5676

Michael A. Xenos is an academic researcher from University of Wisconsin-Madison. The author has contributed to research in topics: Social media & Politics. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 110 publications receiving 4734 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael A. Xenos include University of Washington & Louisiana State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond lifestyle politics in a time of crisis?: comparing young peoples’ issue agendas and views on inequality

TL;DR: The authors investigated whether young people's experience of national economic austerity and increasing material inequality shapes the everyday political issues they identify with, and how they understand inequality and the distribution of resources in their societies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Candidates' Web Practices in the 2002 U.S. House, Senate, and Gubernatorial Elections

TL;DR: In this paper, the extent to which U.S. campaigns adapt traditional campaign strategies to the Web and/or develop innovative strategies that employ some of the particular affordances of Web technologies and on how well campaign characteristics, such as incumbency and major party affiliation, and race characteristics, explain the level of a campaign's adaptation of or innovation with Web technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stimulating Upstream Engagement: An Experimental Study of Nanotechnology Information Seeking

TL;DR: In this paper, a series of logistic and OLS regression analyses explore data from a laboratory experiment on information-seeking behavior, knowledge, and willingness to engage with the issue of nanotechnology in the future.
Journal ArticleDOI

Seeing through risk-colored glasses: Risk and benefit perceptions, knowledge, and the politics of fracking in the United States

TL;DR: The authors found that those who perceive themselves as highly knowledgeable about fracking are the most likely to be polarized by political ideology in their perceptions of the level of risk and benefit associated with fracking and, in turn, their level of support for the technology.