scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael Gelder

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  50
Citations -  7220

Michael Gelder is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Panic disorder & Agoraphobia. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 50 publications receiving 6985 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses.

TL;DR: Negative opinions indiscriminately overemphasize social handicaps that can accompany mental disorders, which contribute to social isolation, distress and difficulties in employment faced by sufferers.
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of cognitive therapy, applied relaxation and imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder.

TL;DR: C cognitive therapy was superior to both applied relaxation and imipramine on most measures and self-exposure homework assignments taken at the end of treatment were significant predictors of outcome at follow-up.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Phobia: The Role of In-Situation Safety Behaviors in Maintaining Anxiety and Negative Beliefs

TL;DR: In this article, it is shown that exposure plus decreased safety behaviors was significantly better than exposure alone in reducing within-situation anxiety and belief in the feared catastrophe, while other factors that may moderate exposure effects are also discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Science and practice of cognitive behaviour therapy

TL;DR: Clark and Fairburn as discussed by the authors have published an extensive and well-documented text that attempts to scientifically ground the practice of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) by linking CBT to the scientific method.

Stigmatization of people with mental illnesses: a follow-up study within the Changing Minds campaign of the Royal College of Psychiatrists RESEARCH REPORT

TL;DR: The authors found that negative opinions about people with mental illnesses were widely held, and opinions about different disorders differed in important ways, and that the greatest proportion of negative opinions was in the 16-19 year age group and respondents with higher education were less likely to express such views.