scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael J. Gill

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  17
Citations -  834

Michael J. Gill is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Interpretative phenomenological analysis & Participant observation. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 17 publications receiving 677 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael J. Gill include University of Bath.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Possibilities of Phenomenology for Organizational Research

TL;DR: In this paper, a typology that classifies and contrasts five popular phenomenological methodologies is presented, along with a series of guidelines to guide researchers in choosing the methodologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reconsidering the value of covert research: the role of ambiguous consent in participant observation

TL;DR: In this paper, the benefits and costs of covert participant observation are discussed, and different ethical perspectives and techniques to address the practical challenges of such a method are explored. But, they do not address the ethical aspects of such an approach, such as; gaining access, collecting data surreptitiously, reducing harm to participants, leaving the site of study and addressing ethical issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Elite identity and status anxiety: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of management consultants

TL;DR: This article explored the experiences of eight management consultants in the British office of a global consulting firm over several months and found that the continual promotion of an elite identity within the consulting firm leaves many of the consultants feeling acutely anxious about their status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Constructing Trustworthy Historical Narratives: Criteria, Principles and Techniques

TL;DR: In this paper, organizational historians bring their role in the construction of historical narratives to the fore and open their research decisions up for discussion, and provide guidelines to support this endeavor, drawing on four criteria that are prevalent within interpretive organization studies for developing the trustworthiness of research: credibility, confirmability, dependability and transferability.
Journal ArticleDOI

The function of fear in institutional maintenance: Feeling frightened as an essential ingredient in haute cuisine

TL;DR: This paper found that the multifaceted emotion of fear characterised chefs' experiences and served to sustain their institution, and that the very experience and eliciting of fear preserved an essential institutional ingredient.