scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael R. Dove

Researcher at Yale University

Publications -  143
Citations -  4629

Michael R. Dove is an academic researcher from Yale University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Indigenous & Politics. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 142 publications receiving 4334 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael R. Dove include American Museum of Natural History & Rockefeller Foundation.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Review Article: Socio-Political Aspects of Home Gardens in Java

TL;DR: Pekarangan, Petani, and Kemiskinan as discussed by the authors studied the features and facts of the farming community in Sriharjo, rural Java, focusing on the home gardening community.
Journal ArticleDOI

Engaging the unengaged: Understanding residents’ perceptions of social access to urban public space

TL;DR: In this article, the authors use selected ethnographic field methods supplemented with semi-structured interviews to advance the concept of social access to urban green spaces, including people, activities, novelty, and ability, and five underlying historical and socio-cultural narratives used to describe these dimensions.
Posted Content

Anthropogenic Grasslands in Southeast Asia: Sociology of Knowledge and Implications for Agroforestry

TL;DR: This paper analyzed the historic, cultural, political, and institutional factors that affect the way grasslands are viewed, drawing largely on data from Southeast Asia and found that national and international agencies view grasslands not as a common land cover but as a development problem.
Journal ArticleDOI

Man, land and game in sumbawa: some observations on agrarian ecology and development policy in eastern indonesia

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the relationship between human populations, agriculture, and land cover in Sumbawa, which with one or two possible exceptions seems to be in accord with Boserup's (1965) thesis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategies for changing the intellectual climate

TL;DR: Barnes et al. as discussed by the authors argue that a single, seamless concept of integrated knowledge cannot do justice to the diversity of meanings that need to be brought to bear in addressing the challenges of global environmental change.