scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael Zink

Researcher at University of Massachusetts Amherst

Publications -  143
Citations -  3213

Michael Zink is an academic researcher from University of Massachusetts Amherst. The author has contributed to research in topics: The Internet & Cache. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 140 publications receiving 2770 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael Zink include Panasonic & University of Liège.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Characteristics of YouTube network traffic at a campus network - Measurements, models, and implications

TL;DR: The results of these simulations show that P2P-based distribution and proxy caching can reduce network traffic significantly and allow for faster access to video clips.
Proceedings Article

The design and operation of cloudlab

TL;DR: This paper presents the experiences designing and operating CloudLab for four years, serving nearly 4,000 users who have run over 79,000 experiments on 2,250 servers, switches, and other pieces of datacenter equipment, and draws lessons organized around two themes.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Automated negotiation with decommitment for dynamic resource allocation in cloud computing

TL;DR: This paper proposes a distributed negotiation mechanism where agents negotiate over both a contract price and a decommitment penalty, which allows agents to decommit from contracts at a cost and achieves a higher social welfare.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Watch Global, Cache Local: YouTube Network Traffic at a Campus Network - Measurements and Implications

TL;DR: In this article, a measurement study of YouTube traffic in a large university campus network was conducted and the results of these simulations show that client-based local caching, P2P-based distribution, and proxy caching can reduce network traffic significantly and allow faster access to video clips.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Subjective impression of variations in layer encoded videos

TL;DR: To a large degree existing (unproven) assumptions about quality degradation caused by variations in layer encoded videos are validated, however there were also some interesting, at first sight counterintuitive findings from the experiment.