scispace - formally typeset
M

Michal Feldman

Researcher at Tel Aviv University

Publications -  245
Citations -  7733

Michal Feldman is an academic researcher from Tel Aviv University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Common value auction & Nash equilibrium. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 231 publications receiving 6854 citations. Previous affiliations of Michal Feldman include University of Tübingen & Microsoft.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Robust incentive techniques for peer-to-peer networks

TL;DR: This work model the P2P system using the Generalized Prisoner's Dilemma, and proposes the Reciprocative decision function as the basis of a family of incentives techniques that can drive a system of strategic users to nearly optimal levels of cooperation.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Free-riding and whitewashing in peer-to-peer systems

TL;DR: A model to study the phenomenon of free-riding and free-identities in peer-to-peer systems finds that imposing penalty on all users that join the system is effective under many scenarios and that system performance degrades significantly only when the turnover rate among users is high.
Journal ArticleDOI

Free-riding and whitewashing in peer-to-peer systems

TL;DR: A model to study the phenomenon of free-riding and free-identities in peer-to-peer systems finds that imposing penalty on all users that join the system is effective under many scenarios and that system performance degrades significantly only when the turnover rate among users is high.
Journal ArticleDOI

Overcoming free-riding behavior in peer-to-peer systems

TL;DR: This paper surveys recent research at the intersection of economics and computer science that targets the design of distributed systems consisting of rational participants with diverse and selfish interests and discusses major findings and open questions related to free-riding in P2P systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strong price of anarchy

TL;DR: In this article, the authors define the strong price of anarchy (SPoA) to be the ratio of the worst strong equilibrium to the social optimum, which quantifies the loss incurred from the lack of a central designer in settings that allow for coordination.