M
Micheline Saint-Jean
Researcher at Université de Montréal
Publications - 17
Citations - 125
Micheline Saint-Jean is an academic researcher from Université de Montréal. The author has contributed to research in topics: Occupational therapy & Mental health. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 17 publications receiving 117 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Determinants of Return-to-Work among Employees Absent Due to Mental Health Problems
TL;DR: The profile of workers who have been absent due to a mental health problem is described and those who returned to those who did not, and those for whom there was resolution or non resolution of their health problem are compared.
Journal ArticleDOI
De la désinsertion à la réinsertion professionnelle à la suite d’un arrêt de travail pour un problème de santé mentale
TL;DR: In this article, a methodologie based on a set of donnees d'entrevues individuelles colligees aupres de travailleurs who s-etaient absentes for a sante mentale, certifie par un diagnostic medical.
Journal ArticleDOI
Modèle de l’engagement et de l’abandon de traitement de l’adolescent avec trouble de personnalité limite
TL;DR: In this paper, a methode de theorisation ancree constructiviste avec un devis de cas multiples a ete utilisee was used to identify les determinants de l’abandon qui sont specifiques aux adolescents avec TPL and decrit les processus par lesquels ceux-ci interferent avec la poursuite du traitement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Treatment planning: A key milestone to prevent treatment dropout in adolescents with borderline personality disorder.
TL;DR: Systematic assessment of treatment dropout vulnerabilities before the intervention plan is laid out could foster better-suited responses of the care setting thus decreasing the incidence of treatment discontinuation in adolescents with borderline personality disorder.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Impact of a Pre-Vocational Program on Cognition, Symptoms, and Work Re-Integration in Schizophrenia
TL;DR: Results showed statistically significant differences in negative and general symptoms, visual attention, learning, and integration to work when comparing the two groups in favor of the program.