scispace - formally typeset
M

Miguel Ángel González-Block

Researcher at Universidad Anáhuac México Norte

Publications -  56
Citations -  1649

Miguel Ángel González-Block is an academic researcher from Universidad Anáhuac México Norte. The author has contributed to research in topics: Public health & Health policy. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 51 publications receiving 1455 citations. Previous affiliations of Miguel Ángel González-Block include Colef & World Health Organization.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment.

TL;DR: It is concluded that research utilisation can be better understood, and enhanced, by developing assessment methods informed by conceptual analysis and review of previous studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health policy and systems research agendas in developing countries

TL;DR: A conceptual framework is offered and the HPSR portfolio is defined as a set of research projects under implementation as a basis to identify and contrast research needs, projects and products at the international level and to identify the actor agendas and their influence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research influence on antimalarial drug policy change in Tanzania: case study of replacing chloroquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as the first-line drug

TL;DR: The role of researchers in producing evidence that influenced the Tanzanian government replace chloroquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) as the first-line drug is described and the challenges faced in convincing policy-makers, general practitioners, pharmaceutical industry and the general public on the need for change are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mapping the use of research to support strategies tackling maternal and child health inequities: evidence from six countries in Africa and Latin America

TL;DR: The way in which research influenced MCH policies and programs in six countries is presented, with a visible gap between researchers and policymakers regarding their different intentions to link evidence and decision making processes.