M
Ming-Lun Lu
Researcher at National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Publications - 30
Citations - 497
Ming-Lun Lu is an academic researcher from National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Low back pain & Minimum bounding box. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 27 publications receiving 366 citations. Previous affiliations of Ming-Lun Lu include University of Cincinnati.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficacy of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation to Predict Risk of Low Back Pain Due to Manual Lifting: Expanded Cross-Sectional Analysis
TL;DR: It is clear that as the lifting index (LI) increases, the risk of LBP increases and longitudinal studies are needed.
Journal ArticleDOI
New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
TL;DR: The sequential lifting index (SLI) is presented, a new conceptual method for assessing the physical demands for sequential manual lifting jobs and should be useful in assisting safety and health specialists to prioritize or rank hazardous jobs within a plant.
Journal ArticleDOI
Efficacy of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation to Predict Risk of Low-Back Pain Associated With Manual Lifting: A One-Year Prospective Study
TL;DR: The CLI > 2 threshold may be useful for predicting self-reported LBP, and research with a larger sample size is needed to clarify the exposure–response relationship between the CLI and LBP.
Journal ArticleDOI
Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research
TL;DR: Before the widespread implementation of industrial exoskeletons occurs, there is need for prospective interventional studies to evaluate the safety and health effectiveness of exoskeleton effectiveness across various industry sectors.
Journal ArticleDOI
An investigation of hand forces and postures for using selected mechanical pipettes
TL;DR: The study results showed several advantages of using the non-axial pipette over the traditional axial ones, and increased forearm pronation by approximately 100–150% for the entire pipetting cycle, as compared to the axial pipettes.