M
Moore Bk
Researcher at Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Publications - 28
Citations - 987
Moore Bk is an academic researcher from Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis. The author has contributed to research in topics: Bond strength & Dentin. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 28 publications receiving 942 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing
TL;DR: There appeared to be a trend for higher bond strength values with bovine than with human dentin, and the shear test produced more true adhesive failures; thus it may be preferable to use aShear test for adhesion testing.
Journal ArticleDOI
Depth of Cure of Dental Resin Composites: ISO 4049 Depth and Microhardness of Types of Materials and Shades
TL;DR: Manufacturers need to provide quantitative information about DOC at specific activation times and light intensities for their entire range of resin materials and shades so that the dentist can devise a placement technique that will ensure adequate cure of the bulk of a restoration.
Journal ArticleDOI
Corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel
TL;DR: This study indicates that considering corrosion resistance, 2205 duplex stainless steel is an improved alternative to 316L for orthodontic bracket fabrication when used in conjunction with titanium, its alloys, or stainless steel arch wires.
Journal ArticleDOI
Analysis of the dentin-resin interface by use of laser Raman spectroscopy.
TL;DR: From the Raman spectroscopy results, the hybrid layer represents a gradual transition in the relative amount of adhesive from the resin side to dentin side and evidence of poor saturation of the adhesive resin in the demineralized dentin with the one-bottle adhesive system was detected.
Journal Article
Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
TL;DR: Three hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials, containing an intrinsic surfactant, were compared with a hydrophobicPolyether impression material, and their wettability was comparable to the polyether material, indicating that the topical surfactants was more effective than the intrinsic surfACTants.