scispace - formally typeset
N

Neal F. Johnson

Researcher at Ohio State University

Publications -  33
Citations -  864

Neal F. Johnson is an academic researcher from Ohio State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Word recognition & Sentence. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 33 publications receiving 852 citations. Previous affiliations of Neal F. Johnson include University of Minnesota.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The psychological reality of phrase-structure rules

TL;DR: The experiment was designed to determine the extent to which adult Ss would use their knowledge of grammar to break a sentence into functional subunits as they attempt to learn it, and indicated that the conditional probabilities were predictable from the linguistic structure of the sentences.
Book ChapterDOI

The Role of Chunking and Organization in The Process of Recall

TL;DR: This chapter discusses the role of chunking and organization in the process of recall, which plays a major role in the associative relations between an item in a sequence and all the other items in the sequence.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model

TL;DR: Three experiments are reported which demonstrate that subjects can identify a word faster than a letter within a word, but that words and single letters in isolation are identified equally fast.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition

TL;DR: A model of word recognition is proposed which assumes that when a word is encountered, the first available orthographic code activates all lexical entries that are positionally consistent with that information (i.e., the word's cohort), and the cohort is resolved when only a single candidate remains.
Journal ArticleDOI

Massed Versus Distributed Repetition of Homographs: A Test of the Differential-Encoding Hypothesis.

TL;DR: In this article, a series of three experiments were designed to test the adequacy of the differential-encoding hypothesis as an explanation of the effect of massed versus distributed repetition on the recall of repeated items in a free-recall list.