scispace - formally typeset
N

Neera M. Singh

Researcher at University of Toronto

Publications -  12
Citations -  757

Neera M. Singh is an academic researcher from University of Toronto. The author has contributed to research in topics: Community forestry & Politics. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 12 publications receiving 668 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance

TL;DR: In this article, the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) was ready to endorse REDD-plus and to make explicit reference to the rights of indigenous peoples and members of local communities.
Journal ArticleDOI

The affective labor of growing forests and the becoming of environmental subjects: Rethinking environmentality in Odisha, India

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the applications of governmentality tend to privilege technologies of power and pay insufficient attention to the role of affect, emotions, and embodied practices in shaping human subjectivities.
Book

Devolution As A Threat To Democratic Decision Making In Forestry?: Findings From Three States In India

TL;DR: In this article, the authors look at two interfacing trends shaping devolution of forest management in India: i appropriation of space for forest management by diverse self-initiated community formations at the grass roots level despite state seizure of forests ii state-driven devolution where government policies define the scope of local authority in forest management.
Journal ArticleDOI

Decentralisation and democratic forest reforms in India: Moving to a rights-based approach

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the potential of the Recognition of Forest Rights Act (RFRA) to hold the forest bureaucracy accountable to forest-dweller communities and its ability to shift tangible legal powers and authority to forest dwellers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: Sharing the burden and joy of environmental care

TL;DR: The authors argue that instead of framing conservation as a burdensome activity that entails sacrifice and costs alone, we need to pay attention to the joyful and life-affirming aspects of conservation care labor and its transformative potential.