N
Neil Greenberg
Researcher at University of Rochester
Publications - 17
Citations - 1606
Neil Greenberg is an academic researcher from University of Rochester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Traceability & Standardization. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 16 publications receiving 1411 citations. Previous affiliations of Neil Greenberg include Johnson & Johnson.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Recommendations for Improving Serum Creatinine Measurement: A Report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program
Gary L. Myers,W. Greg Miller,Josef Coresh,James K. Fleming,Neil Greenberg,Tom Greene,Thomas H. Hostetter,Andrew S. Levey,Mauro Panteghini,Michael J. Welch,John H. Eckfeldt +10 more
TL;DR: The NKDEP Laboratory Working Group has developed a plan that enables standardization and improved accuracy (trueness) of serum creatinine measurements in clinical laboratories worldwide that includes the use of the estimating equation for GFR based on serum Creatinine concentration that was developed from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study.
Journal ArticleDOI
Specificity Characteristics of 7 Commercial Creatinine Measurement Procedures By Enzymatic and Jaffe Method Principles
Neil Greenberg,William L. Roberts,Lorin M. Bachmann,Elizabeth C. Wright,R. Neil Dalton,Jack Zakowski,W. Greg Miller +6 more
TL;DR: There were differences in both magnitude and direction of bias among measurement procedures, whether enzymatic or Jaffe, and the influence of interfering substances was less frequent with the enzyme-based procedures, but no procedure was unaffected.
Journal ArticleDOI
IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 1: General Experimental Design.
W. Greg Miller,Heinz Schimmel,Robert Rej,Neil Greenberg,Ferruccio Ceriotti,Chris Burns,Jeffrey R. Budd,Cas Weykamp,Vincent Delatour,Göran Nilsson,Finlay MacKenzie,Mauro Panteghini,Thomas Keller,Johanna E. Camara,Ingrid Zegers,Hubert W. Vesper +15 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe how to assess commutability of reference material (RM) that relates to the closeness of agreement between results for an RM and results for clinical samples (CSs) when measured by ≥2 measurement procedures (MPs).
Journal ArticleDOI
IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 2: Using the Difference in Bias between a Reference Material and Clinical Samples.
Göran Nilsson,Jeffrey R. Budd,Neil Greenberg,Vincent Delatour,Robert Rej,Mauro Panteghini,Ferruccio Ceriotti,Heinz Schimmel,Cas Weykamp,Thomas Keller,Johanna E. Camara,Chris Burns,Hubert W. Vesper,Finlay MacKenzie,W. Greg Miller +14 more
TL;DR: An RM is considered fit for purpose for those MPs for which commutability is demonstrated because the assessment is based on an error model that allows estimation of various random and systematic sources of error, including those from sample-specific effects of interfering substances.
Journal ArticleDOI
IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 3: Using the Calibration Effectiveness of a Reference Material
Jeffrey R. Budd,Cas Weykamp,Robert Rej,Finlay MacKenzie,Ferruccio Ceriotti,Neil Greenberg,Johanna E. Camara,Heinz Schimmel,Hubert W. Vesper,Thomas Keller,Vincent Delatour,Mauro Panteghini,Chris Burns,W. Greg Miller +13 more
TL;DR: A process is described to assess the commutability of a reference material (RM) intended for use as a calibrator based on its ability to fulfill its intended use in a calibration traceability scheme to produce equivalent clinical sample results among different measurement procedures (MPs) for the same measurand.