scispace - formally typeset
N

Neil R. Smalheiser

Researcher at University of Illinois at Chicago

Publications -  183
Citations -  9534

Neil R. Smalheiser is an academic researcher from University of Illinois at Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neurite & MEDLINE. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 179 publications receiving 8933 citations. Previous affiliations of Neil R. Smalheiser include Oregon Health & Science University & University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Evidence-based medicine, the essential role of systematic reviews, and the need for automated text mining tools

TL;DR: A specific text-mining based pipeline is proposed to support the creation and updating of evidence reports that provides support for the literature collection, collation, and triage steps of the systematic review process, and will provide a test-bed for further informatics research to develop improved tools in the future.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neurites from mouse retina and dorsal root ganglion explants show specific behavior within co-cultured tectum or spinal cord.

TL;DR: Results indicate that retinal neurites show selective growth and arborizations within their appropriate tectal, target tissue.
Journal ArticleDOI

Informatics and hypothesis‐driven research

Neil R. Smalheiser
- 01 Aug 2002 - 
TL;DR: It is suggested that research databases that are populated and analysed according to specific ‘data-driven discovery’ techniques, not as providing data, but rather as providing significant ‘added value’.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rediscovering Don Swanson: the Past, Present and Future of Literature-Based Discovery.

TL;DR: Experiments show that comparing with traditional methods, the feature representation method is more effective than traditional methods and can significantly improve the performance of biomedcial data clustering.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine

TL;DR: In this work, highly accurate machine learning predictive models were built that include confidence predictions of whether an article is an RCT, potentially more useful for article ranking and review than a simple yes/no prediction.