scispace - formally typeset
N

Neil R. Smalheiser

Researcher at University of Illinois at Chicago

Publications -  183
Citations -  9534

Neil R. Smalheiser is an academic researcher from University of Illinois at Chicago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neurite & MEDLINE. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 179 publications receiving 8933 citations. Previous affiliations of Neil R. Smalheiser include Oregon Health & Science University & University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Biosynthesis of Glycosaminoglycans and Proteoglycans

TL;DR: The class of polysaccharides known as glycosaminoglycans consists of repeated disaccharides, usually containing a sulfated hexosamine and uronic acid, which are thought to be important for tissue turgor and hydration, ion binding and buffering, and tensile strength and resiliency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Launching the " Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration "

TL;DR: The Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration was created to provide, for the first time, a unified forum to consider all factors that affect scientific practice and scientific discovery – with an emphasis on the changing face of contemporary biomedical science.
Journal ArticleDOI

Positional specificity tests in co-culture of retinal and tectal explants

TL;DR: Enter of retinal fibers into appropriate vs inappropriate half-tectal regions in 8 out of 8 blind scorings are identified and encourage further, more critical analyses of retinotectal co-cultures to explore the basis of the specific neuritic connections which form in situ.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cell attachment and neurite stability in NG108-15 cells: what is the role of microtubules?

TL;DR: P patterns of trypsin-induced resorption resembled those seen 'spontaneously' in NG108-15 cells growing on laminin, and in fibroblastic CHO cells, suggesting that these results may be both physiologically relevant and applicable widely to many cell types.
Book ChapterDOI

The Place of Literature-Based Discovery in Contemporary Scientific Practice

TL;DR: The authors consider some of the lessons that they learned from their experience working with the Arrowsmith consortium that may have implications for the field of literature-based discovery as a whole, and present a brief essay that considers some of these lessons.