Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent than rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.

https://www.motherjones.com/files/emotional_dog_and_rational_tail.pdf

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

A role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders proposes that perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles leads to 2 forms of prejudice: (a) perceiving women less favorably than men as potential occupants of leadership roles and (b) evaluating behavior that fulfills the prescriptions of a leader role less favorably when it is enacted by a woman. One consequence is that attitudes are less positive toward female than male leaders and potential leaders. Other consequences are that it is more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles. Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that these consequences occur, especially in situations that heighten perceptions of incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles.

/pdf/role-congruity-theory-of-prejudice-toward-female-leaders-4ldbwpzzgm.pdf

Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

Drawing upon philosophy and social theory, Social Theory of International Politics develops a theory of the international system as a social construction. Alexander Wendt clarifies the central claims of the constructivist approach, presenting a structural and idealist worldview which contrasts with the individualism and materialism which underpins much mainstream international relations theory. He builds a cultural theory of international politics, which takes whether states view each other as enemies, rivals or friends as a fundamental determinant. Wendt characterises these roles as 'cultures of anarchy', described as Hobbesian, Lockean and Kantian respectively. These cultures are shared ideas which help shape state interests and capabilities, and generate tendencies in the international system. The book describes four factors which can drive structural change from one culture to another - interdependence, common fate, homogenization, and self-restraint - and examines the effects of capitalism and democracy in the emergence of a Kantian culture in the West.

/pdf/social-theory-of-international-politics-3eegdnnwai.pdf

Social Theory of International Politics

The authors present a theory of sexism formulated as ambivalence toward women and validate a corresponding measure, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI). The ASI taps 2 positively correlated components of sexism that nevertheless represent opposite evaluative orientations toward women: sexist antipathy or Hostile Sexism (HS) and a subjectively positive ( for sexist men ) orientation toward women, Benevolent Sexism (BS). HS and BS are hypothesized to encompass 3 sources of male ambivalence: Paternalism, Gender Differentiation, and Heterosexuality. Six ASI studies on 2,250 respondents established convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Overall ASI scores predict ambivalent attitudes toward women, the HS scale correlates with negative attitudes toward and stereotypes about women, and the BS scale (for nonstudent men only) correlates with positive attitudes toward and stereotypes about women. A copy of the ASI is provided, with scoring instructions, as a tool for further explorations of sexist ambivalence.

The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

Perceived discrimination has been studied with regard to its impact on several types of health effects. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive account of the relationships between multiple forms of perceived discrimination and both mental and physical health outcomes. In addition, this meta-analysis examines potential mechanisms by which perceiving discrimination may affect health, including through psychological and physiological stress responses and health behaviors. Analysis of 134 samples suggests that when weighting each study's contribution by sample size, perceived discrimination has a significant negative effect on both mental and physical health. Perceived discrimination also produces significantly heightened stress responses and is related to participation in unhealthy and nonparticipation in healthy behaviors. These findings suggest potential pathways linking perceived discrimination to negative health outcomes.

/pdf/perceived-discrimination-and-health-a-meta-analytic-review-4aai112ban.pdf

Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review.

The concept of dehumanization lacks a systematic theoretical basis, and research that addresses it has yet to be integrated. Manifestations and theories of dehumanization are reviewed, and a new model is developed. Two forms of dehumanization are proposed, involving the denial to others of 2 distinct senses of humanness: characteristics that are uniquely human and those that constitute human nature. Denying uniquely human attributes to others represents them as animal-like, and denying human nature to others represents them as objects or automata. Cognitive underpinnings of the "animalistic" and "mechanistic" forms of dehumanization are proposed. An expanded sense of dehumanization emerges, in which the phenomenon is not unitary, is not restricted to the intergroup context, and does not occur only under conditions of conflict or extreme negative evaluation. Instead, dehumanization becomes an everyday social phenomenon, rooted in ordinary social-cognitive processes.

/pdf/dehumanization-an-integrative-review-5ggc5srjoo.pdf

Dehumanization: An Integrative Review

ContextThe global refugee crisis requires that researchers, policymakers, and
clinicians comprehend the magnitude of the psychological consequences of forced
displacement and the factors that moderate them. To date, no empirical synthesis
of research on these issues has been undertaken.ObjectiveTo meta-analytically establish the extent of compromised mental health
among refugees (including internally displaced persons, asylum seekers, and
stateless persons) using a worldwide study sample. Potential moderators of
mental health outcomes were examined, including enduring contextual variables
(eg, postdisplacement accommodation and economic opportunity) and refugee
characteristics.Data SourcesPublished studies (1959-2002) were obtained using broad searches of
computerized databases (PsycINFO and PILOTS), manual searches of reference
lists, and interviews with prominent authors.Study SelectionStudies were selected if they investigated a refugee group and at least
1 nonrefugee comparison group and reported 1 or more quantitative group comparison
on measures of psychopathology. Fifty-six reports met inclusion criteria (4.4%
of identified reports), yielding 59 independent comparisons and including
67 294 participants (22 221 refugees and 45 073 nonrefugees).Data ExtractionData on study and report characteristics, study participant characteristics,
and statistical outcomes were extracted using a coding manual and subjected
to blind recoding, which indicated high reliability. Methodological quality
information was coded to assess potential sources of bias.Data SynthesisEffect size estimates for the refugee-nonrefugee comparisons were averaged
across psychopathology measures within studies and weighted by sample size.
The weighted mean effect size was 0.41 (SD, 0.02; range, −1.36 to 2.91
[SE, 0.01]), indicating that refugees had moderately poorer outcomes. Postdisplacement
conditions moderated mental health outcomes. Worse outcomes were observed
for refugees living in institutional accommodation, experiencing restricted
economic opportunity, displaced internally within their own country, repatriated
to a country they had previously fled, or whose initiating conflict was unresolved.
Refugees who were older, more educated, and female and who had higher predisplacement
socioeconomic status and rural residence also had worse outcomes. Methodological
differences between studies affected effect sizes.ConclusionsThe sociopolitical context of the refugee experience is associated with
refugee mental health. Humanitarian efforts that improve these conditions
are likely to have positive impacts.

Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis.

This study examines beliefs about the ontological status of social categories, asking whether their members are understood to share fixed, inhering essences or natures. Forty social categories were rated on nine elements of essentialism. These elements formed two independent dimensions, representing the degrees to which categories are understood as natural kinds and as coherent entities with inhering cores ('entitativity' or reification), respectively. Reification was negatively associated with categories' evaluative status, especially among those categories understood to be natural kinds. Essentialism is not a unitary syndrome of social beliefs, and is not monolithically associated with devaluation and prejudice, but it illuminates several aspects of social categorization.

Essentialist beliefs about social categories.

We review early and recent psychological theories of dehumanization and survey the burgeoning empirical literature, focusing on six fundamental questions. First, we examine how people are dehumanized, exploring the range of ways in which perceptions of lesser humanness have been conceptualized and demonstrated. Second, we review who is dehumanized, examining the social targets that have been shown to be denied humanness and commonalities among them. Third, we investigate who dehumanizes, notably the personality, ideological, and other individual differences that increase the propensity to see others as less than human. Fourth, we explore when people dehumanize, focusing on transient situational and motivational factors that promote dehumanizing perceptions. Fifth, we examine the consequences of dehumanization, emphasizing its implications for prosocial and antisocial behavior and for moral judgment. Finally, we ask what can be done to reduce dehumanization. We conclude with a discussion of limitations of current scholarship and directions for future research.

Dehumanization and infrahumanization.

Objective: Many anti-stigma programmes use the ‘mental illness is an illness like any other’ approach. This review evaluates the effectiveness of this approach in relation to schizophrenia.

Method:  The academic literature was searched, via PsycINFO and MEDLINE, to identify peer-reviewed studies addressing whether public espousal of a biogenetic paradigm has increased over time, and whether biogenetic causal beliefs and diagnostic labelling are associated with less negative attitudes.

Results:  The public, internationally, continues to prefer psychosocial to biogenetic explanations and treatments for schizophrenia. Biogenetic causal theories and diagnostic labelling as ‘illness’, are both positively related to perceptions of dangerousness and unpredictability, and to fear and desire for social distance.

Conclusion:  An evidence-based approach to reducing discrimination would seek a range of alternatives to the ‘mental illness is an illness like any other’ approach, based on enhanced understanding, from multi-disciplinary research, of the causes of prejudice.

Nick Haslam

Papers

Dehumanization: An Integrative Review

Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis.

Essentialist beliefs about social categories.

Dehumanization and infrahumanization.

Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the 'mental illness is an illness like any other' approach.