scispace - formally typeset
N

Nicolaas T.O. Mouton

Researcher at Roskilde University

Publications -  11
Citations -  56

Nicolaas T.O. Mouton is an academic researcher from Roskilde University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intellectual history & Rhetorical question. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 10 publications receiving 47 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Creating Organizational Cultures: Re-Conceptualizing the Relations Between Rhetorical Strategies and Material Practices

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare and contrast two broad perspectives on cultural change in organizations, and propose an integrated perspective in which material practices and rhetorical strategies are seen as two analytical sides of the same ontological coin.
Journal ArticleDOI

A literary perspective on the limits of leadership: Tolstoy’s critique of the great man theory:

Nicolaas T.O. Mouton
- 01 Feb 2019 - 
TL;DR: The traditional Great Man theory of leadership is treated with scant respect, yet it is still widely in use as mentioned in this paper, and this article reconstructs and reevaluates Tolstoy's critique of the claim that great men...
Journal ArticleDOI

Do Metaphors Evolve? The Case of the Social Organism

TL;DR: The authors argue that what may initially appear to be a fixed pattern of projections is often better understood as a temporary station in a fluid process, and that there are good reasons to reconsider both Lakoff's decree that metaphors should not be thought of as processes and his declaration that they should instead be seen as consisting of a fixed patterns of ontological correspondences across domains.
Journal ArticleDOI

Framing financial culture – rhetorical struggles over the meaning of “Liborgate”

TL;DR: In this article, a conceptual framework that combines modern framing theory and classical stasis theory is applied to the rhetorical struggles over the meaning of “Liborgate,” and an analysis of the argumentative relations between competing frames leads to the conclusion that this political "blame game" is related to struggles over how to define the scandal, how to conceptualize its causes, and policy recommendations.