https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.28906

Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases.

https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(10)00878-4/pdf

Infections in Patients With Cirrhosis Increase Mortality Four-Fold and Should Be Used in Determining Prognosis

We present here the first update of the 2013 EFSUMB (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) Guidelines and Recommendations on the clinical use of elastography with a focus on the assessment of diffuse liver disease. The short version provides clinical information about the practical use of elastography equipment and interpretation of results in the assessment of diffuse liver disease and analyzes the main findings based on published studies, stressing the evidence from meta-analyses. The role of elastography in different etiologies of liver disease and in several clinical scenarios is also discussed. All of the recommendations are judged with regard to their evidence-based strength according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. This updated document is intended to act as a reference and to provide a practical guide for both beginners and advanced clinical users.

/pdf/efsumb-guidelines-and-recommendations-on-the-clinical-use-of-q0y0yhaqko.pdf

EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version)

Renal failure, a challenging complication of cirrhosis, is one of the most important risk factors for liver transplantation. In recent years, substantial progress has been made toward understanding the pathogenesis and natural history of renal failure in cirrhosis. This review discusses recently identified information about renal failure in cirrhosis and clinical interventions that may assist in the prevention and management of this complication.

/pdf/renal-failure-in-cirrhosis-1cnfpgh4w1.pdf

Renal Failure in Cirrhosis

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). Main Recommendations
 MR1. ESGE recommends immediate assessment of hemodynamic status in patients who present with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH), with prompt intravascular volume replacement initially using crystalloid fluids if hemodynamic instability exists (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR2. ESGE recommends a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy that aims for a target hemoglobin between 7 g/dL and 9 g/dL. A higher target hemoglobin should be considered in patients with significant co-morbidity (e. g., ischemic cardiovascular disease) (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR3. ESGE recommends the use of the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) for pre-endoscopy risk stratification. Outpatients determined to be at very low risk, based upon a GBS score of 0 – 1, do not require early endoscopy nor hospital admission. Discharged patients should be informed of the risk of recurrent bleeding and be advised to maintain contact with the discharging hospital (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR4. ESGE recommends initiating high dose intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPI), intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (80 mg then 8 mg/hour), in patients presenting with acute UGIH awaiting upper endoscopy. However, PPI infusion should not delay the performance of early endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR5. ESGE does not recommend the routine use of nasogastric or orogastric aspiration/lavage in patients presenting with acute UGIH (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR6. ESGE recommends intravenous erythromycin (single dose, 250 mg given 30 – 120 minutes prior to upper gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy) in patients with clinically severe or ongoing active UGIH. In selected patients, pre-endoscopic infusion of erythromycin significantly improves endoscopic visualization, reduces the need for second-look endoscopy, decreases the number of units of blood transfused, and reduces duration of hospital stay (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR7. Following hemodynamic resuscitation, ESGE recommends early (≤ 24 hours) upper GI endoscopy. Very early ( MR8. ESGE recommends that peptic ulcers with spurting or oozing bleeding (Forrest classification Ia and Ib, respectively) or with a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) receive endoscopic hemostasis because these lesions are at high risk for persistent bleeding or rebleeding (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR9. ESGE recommends that peptic ulcers with an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb) be considered for endoscopic clot removal. Once the clot is removed, any identified underlying active bleeding (Forrest classification Ia or Ib) or nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) should receive endoscopic hemostasis (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR10. In patients with peptic ulcers having a flat pigmented spot (Forrest classification IIc) or clean base (Forrest classification III), ESGE does not recommend endoscopic hemostasis as these stigmata present a low risk of recurrent bleeding. In selected clinical settings, these patients may be discharged to home on standard PPI therapy, e. g., oral PPI once-daily (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). MR11. ESGE recommends that epinephrine injection therapy not be used as endoscopic monotherapy. If used, it should be combined with a second endoscopic hemostasis modality (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR12. ESGE recommends PPI therapy for patients who receive endoscopic hemostasis and for patients with adherent clot not receiving endoscopic hemostasis. PPI therapy should be high dose and administered as an intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (80 mg then 8 mg/hour) for 72 hours post endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR13. ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy as part of the management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). However, in patients with clinical evidence of rebleeding following successful initial endoscopic hemostasis, ESGE recommends repeat upper endoscopy with hemostasis if indicated. In the case of failure of this second attempt at hemostasis, transcatheter angiographic embolization (TAE) or surgery should be considered (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR14. In patients with NVUGIH secondary to peptic ulcer, ESGE recommends investigating for the presence of Helicobacter pylori in the acute setting with initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy when H. pylori is detected. Re-testing for H. pylori should be performed in those patients with a negative test in the acute setting. Documentation of successful H. pylori eradication is recommended (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). MR15. In patients receiving low dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis who develop peptic ulcer bleeding, ESGE recommends aspirin be resumed immediately following index endoscopy if the risk of rebleeding is low (e. g., FIIc, FIII). In patients with high risk peptic ulcer (FIa, FIb, FIIa, FIIb), early reintroduction of aspirin by day 3 after index endoscopy is recommended, provided that adequate hemostasis has been established (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

/pdf/diagnosis-and-management-of-nonvariceal-upper-zmzickun0k.pdf

Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Alcohol‐related hepatitis (AH) encompasses a high mortality. AH might be a concomitant event in patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB). The current study aimed to assess the prevalence of AH in patients with AVB and to compare the clinical outcomes of AH patients to other alcohol‐related liver disease (ALD) phenotypes and viral cirrhosis.

Alcohol‐related liver disease phenotype impacts survival after an acute variceal bleeding episode

This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page e80. Learning Objectives—At the end of this activity, the learner should be able to understand the incidence of renal failure in patients with ascites and cirrhosis, and recognize the adverse impact on mortality when renal failure develops. BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatorenal syndrome is a wellcharacterized type of terminal renal failure that occurs in patients with cirrhosis with ascites. Information about other types of functional renal failure in these patients is scarce. We assessed the incidence and prognosis of different types of functional renal failure in cirrhotic patients with ascites and investigated prognostic factors for these disorders. METHODS: Consecutive cirrhotic patients (n 263) were followed for 41 3 months after their first incidence of ascites. Three types of functional renal failure were considered: pre-renal failure (when renal failure was associated with a depletion of intravascular volume), renal failure induced by infection that did not result in hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatorenal syndrome. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 129 (49%) patients developed some type of functional renal failure. The most frequent was pre-renal failure (27.4%), followed by renal failure induced by infection (14.1%), and then hepatorenal syndrome (7.6%). The 1-year probability of developing the first episode of any functional renal failure was 23.6%. The independent predictors of functional renal failure development were baseline age, Child–Pugh score, and serum creatinine. Although the 1-year probability of survival was 91% in patients without renal failure, it decreased to 46.9% in those patients who developed any functional renal failure (P .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of the cirrhotic patients with ascites developed some type of functional renal failure during the follow-up period; renal failure was associated with worse prognosis. Efforts should be made to prevent renal failure in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(10)00381-2/pdf

ORIGINAL ARTICLES—LIVER, PANCREAS, AND BILIARY TRACT Incidence and Prognosis of Different Types of Functional Renal Failure in Cirrhotic Patients With Ascites

Nuria Cañete

Papers

Alcohol‐related liver disease phenotype impacts survival after an acute variceal bleeding episode

ORIGINAL ARTICLES—LIVER, PANCREAS, AND BILIARY TRACT Incidence and Prognosis of Different Types of Functional Renal Failure in Cirrhotic Patients With Ascites