1 Introduction 2 Going variational 2.1 Griffith's theory 2.2 The 1-homogeneous case - A variational equivalence 2.3 Smoothness - The soft belly of Griffith's formulation 2.4 The non 1-homogeneous case - A discrete variational evolution 2.5 Functional framework - A weak variational evolution 2.6 Cohesiveness and the variational evolution 3 Stationarity versus local or global minimality - A comparison 3.1 1d traction 3.1.1 The Griffith case - Soft device 3.1.2 The Griffith case - Hard device 3.1.3 Cohesive case - Soft device 3.1.4 Cohesive case - Hard device 3.2 A tearing experiment 4 Initiation 4.1 Initiation - The Griffith case 4.1.1 Initiation - The Griffith case - Global minimality 4.1.2 Initiation - The Griffith case - Local minimality 4.2 Initiation - The cohesive case 4.2.1 Initiation - The cohesive 1d case - Stationarity 4.2.2 Initiation - The cohesive 3d case - Stationarity 4.2.3 Initiation - The cohesive case - Global minimality 5 Irreversibility 5.1 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Well-posedness of the variational evolution 5.1.1 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Discrete evolution 5.1.2 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Global minimality in the limit 5.1.3 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - Energy balance in the limit 5.1.4 Irreversibility - The Griffith case - The time-continuous evolution 5.2 Irreversibility - The cohesive case 6 Path 7 Griffith vs. Barenblatt 8 Numerics and Griffith 8.1 Numerical approximation of the energy 8.1.1 The first time step 8.1.2 Quasi-static evolution 8.2 Minimization algorithm 8.2.1 The alternate minimization algorithm 8.2.2 The backtracking algorithm 8.3 Numerical experiments 8.3.1 The 1D traction (hard device) 8.3.2 The Tearing experiment 8.3.3 Revisiting the 2D traction experiment on a fiber reinforced matrix 9 Fatigue 9.1 Peeling Evolution 9.2 The limitfatigue law when d tends to 0 9.3 A variational formulation for fatigue 9.3.1 Peeling revisited 9.3.2 Generalization Appendix Glossary References.

The Variational Approach to Fracture

The aim of the paper is to study the capabilities of the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) to achieve accurate computations in non smooth situations such as crack problems. Although the XFEM method ensures a weaker error than classical ﬁnite element methods, the rate of convergence is not improved when the mesh parameter h is going to zero because of the presence of a singularity. The diﬃculty can be overcome by modifying the enrichment of the ﬁnite element basis with the asymptotic crack tip displacement solutions as well as with the Heaviside function. Numerical simulations show that the modiﬁed XFEM method achieves an optimal rate of convergence (i.e. like in a standard ﬁnite element method for a smooth problem)

/pdf/high-order-extended-finite-element-method-for-cracked-4wy0ktr1k7.pdf

High-order extended finite element method for cracked domains

(1980). Differentiation with Respect to the Domain in Boundary Value Problems. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization: Vol. 2, No. 7-8, pp. 649-687.

Differentiation with Respect to the Domain in Boundary Value Problems

Phase-field models, sometimes referred to as gradient damage or smeared crack models, are widely used methods for the numerical simulation of crack propagation in brittle materials. Theoretical results and numerical evidences show that they can predict the propagation of a pre-existing crack according to Griffith’ criterion. For a one-dimensional problem, it has been shown that they can predict nucleation upon a critical stress, provided that the regularization parameter be identified with the material’s internal or characteristic length. In this article, we draw on numerical simulations to study crack nucleation in commonly encountered geometries for which closed-form solutions are not available. We use U- and V-notches to show that the nucleation load varies smoothly from that predicted by a strength criterion to that of a toughness criterion when the strength of the stress concentration or singularity varies. We present validation and verification numerical simulations for both types of geometries. We consider the problem of an elliptic cavity in an infinite or elongated domain to show that variational phase field models properly account for structural and material size effects. Our main claim, supported by validation and verification in a broad range of materials and geometries, is that crack nucleation can be accurately predicted by minimization of a nonlinear energy in variational phase field models, and does not require the introduction of ad-hoc criteria.

Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture

We study the evolution of a single crack in an elastic body and assume that the crack path is known in advance. The motion of the crack tip is modeled as a rate-independent process on the basis of Griffith’s local energy release rate criterion. According to this criterion, the system may stay in a local minimum before it performs a jump. The goal of this paper is to prove existence of such an evolution and to shed light on the discrepancy between the local energy release rate criterion and models which are based on a global stability criterion (as for example the Francfort/Marigo model). We construct solutions to the local model via the vanishing viscosity method and compare different notions of weak, local and global solutions.

/pdf/on-the-inviscid-limit-of-a-model-for-crack-propagation-5d4mxv4cnv.pdf

On the inviscid limit of a model for crack propagation

We formulate the assumptions under which Rice J integral and the critical energy release rate, which occur in fragile fracture mechanic, are equivalent.

P. Destuynder

Papers

Sur une Interprétation Mathématique de l'Intégrale de Rice en Théorie de la Rupture Fragile