http://www.ipg.org.br/Rosa_Rademakers_Neuron%20tese%20integra.pdf

Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS

Simple and complex carbohydrates (glycans) have long been known to play major metabolic, structural and physical roles in biological systems. Targeted microbial binding to host glycans has also been studied for decades. But such biological roles can only explain some of the remarkable complexity and organismal diversity of glycans in nature. Reviewing the subject about two decades ago, one could find very few clear-cut instances of glycan-recognition-specific biological roles of glycans that were of intrinsic value to the organism expressing them. In striking contrast there is now a profusion of examples, such that this updated review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, a historical overview is presented, broad principles outlined and a few examples cited, representing diverse types of roles, mediated by various glycan classes, in different evolutionary lineages. What remains unchanged is the fact that while all theories regarding biological roles of glycans are supported by compelling evidence, exceptions to each can be found. In retrospect, this is not surprising. Complex and diverse glycans appear to be ubiquitous to all cells in nature, and essential to all life forms. Thus, >3 billion years of evolution consistently generated organisms that use these molecules for many key biological roles, even while sometimes coopting them for minor functions. In this respect, glycans are no different from other major macromolecular building blocks of life (nucleic acids, proteins and lipids), simply more rapidly evolving and complex. It is time for the diverse functional roles of glycans to be fully incorporated into the mainstream of biological sciences.

/pdf/biological-roles-of-glycans-zowb8sw07y.pdf

Biological Roles of Glycans

Post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR) concerns processes involved in the maturation, transport, stability and translation of coding and non-coding RNAs. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and ribonucleoproteins coordinate RNA processing and PTGR. The introduction of large-scale quantitative methods, such as next-generation sequencing and modern protein mass spectrometry, has renewed interest in the investigation of PTGR and the protein factors involved at a systems-biology level. Here, we present a census of 1,542 manually curated RBPs that we have analysed for their interactions with different classes of RNA, their evolutionary conservation, their abundance and their tissue-specific expression. Our analysis is a critical step towards the comprehensive characterization of proteins involved in human RNA metabolism.

/pdf/a-census-of-human-rna-binding-proteins-1mii7pfs5y.pdf

A census of human RNA-binding proteins.

http://dosequis.colorado.edu/Courses/BrainWeb/papers/ALS1.pdf

Converging mechanisms in ALS and FTD: disrupted RNA and protein homeostasis.

The discovery that expansion of unstable repeats can cause a variety of neurological disorders has changed the landscape of disease-oriented research for several forms of mental retardation, Huntington disease, inherited ataxias, and muscular dystrophy. The dynamic nature of these mutations provided an explanation for the variable phenotype expressivity within a family. Beyond diagnosis and genetic counseling, the benefits from studying these disorders have been noted in both neurobiology and cell biology. Examples include insight about the role of translational control in synaptic plasticity, the role of RNA processing in the integrity of muscle and neuronal function, the importance of Fe-S-containing enzymes for cellular energy, and the dramatic effects of altering protein conformations on neuronal function and survival. It is exciting that within a span of 15 years, pathogenesis studies of this class of disorders are beginning to reveal pathways that are potential therapeutic targets.

Trinucleotide Repeat Disorders

Myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder associated with a (CTG)n expansion in the 3′-untranslated region of the DM1 protein kinase (DMPK) gene. To explain disease pathogenesis, the RNA dominance model proposes that the DM1 mutation produces a gain-of-function at the RNA level in which CUG repeats form RNA hairpins that sequester nuclear factors required for proper muscle development and maintenance. Here, we identify the triplet repeat expansion (EXP) RNA-binding proteins as candidate sequestered factors. As predicted by the RNA dominance model, binding of the EXP proteins is specific for dsCUG RNAs and proportional to the size of the triplet repeat expansion. Remarkably, the EXP proteins are homologous to the Drosophila muscleblind proteins required for terminal differentiation of muscle and photoreceptor cells. EXP expression is also activated during mammalian myoblast differentiation, but the EXP proteins accumulate in nuclear foci in DM1 cells. We propose that DM1 disease is caused by aberrant recruitment of the EXP proteins to the DMPK transcript (CUG)n expansion.

/pdf/recruitment-of-human-muscleblind-proteins-to-cug-n-4blrunrwc1.pdf

Recruitment of human muscleblind proteins to (CUG)(n) expansions associated with myotonic dystrophy.

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) are caused by genomic expansions of CTG or CCTG repeats. When transcribed, these mutations give rise to repeat expansion RNAs that form nuclear inclusions and compromise the function of myonuclei. Here, we have used in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence to compare DM1 and DM2 and search for proteins that associate with the RNA nuclear (ribonuclear) inclusions. Although muscle disease is generally more severe in DM1, the ribonuclear inclusions were 8- to 13-fold more intense in DM2, implying greater amounts of repeat expansion RNA. Expression of repeat expansion RNA in myoblasts has been implicated in the pathogenesis of congenital DM1. However, we found that repeat expansion RNA is also expressed in myoblasts in DM2, a disorder that has not been associated with a congenital phenotype. Of 10 putative CUG binding proteins tested for colocalization with mutant RNA, only proteins in the muscleblind family were recruited into ribonuclear inclusions. Previous studies have shown activation of the protein kinase, PKR, by expanded CUG repeats in vitro. However, breeding experiments utilizing PKR knockout mice indicate that this kinase is not required for disease pathogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of DM1. We conclude that ribonuclear inclusions are a key feature of the muscle pathology in DM and that sequestration of muscleblind proteins may have a direct role in the disease process.

Ribonuclear inclusions in skeletal muscle in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2

The Cytoplasmic F-box Binding Protein SKP1 Contains a Novel Pentasaccharide Linked to Hydroxyproline inDictyostelium

Skp1 is a subunit of SCF-E3 ubiquitin ligases and other protein complexes in the nucleus and cytoplasm of yeast and mammalian cells. In Dictyostelium, Skp1 is partially modified by an unusual pentasaccharide O-linked to hydroxyproline143. This modification was found to be susceptible to known prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors based on M(r)-shift analysis using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/Western blotting. In addition, Dictyostelium Skp1 consists of 2 genetic isoforms, Skp1A and Skp1B, which differ by a single amino acid and appear to be expressed throughout the life cycle based on reverse-transcription polymerase chain reactions. The significance of these structural variations was examined by expressing myc-tagged Skp1s and mutants that lacked the glycosylation site. Gel-based M(r)-shift studies showed that Skp1A and Skp1B are both nearly completely glycosylated during growth and early development, and mass spectrometry of glycopeptides showed that they were glycosylated similarly. Skp1 expressed later in prespore cells was not glycosylated, unlike bulk Skp1 persisting from earlier in development, but became glycosylated after return to growth medium. Skp1A and Skp1B were each concentrated in the nucleus and regions of the cytoplasm, based on immunofluorescence localization. However, when Skp1 glycosylation was blocked by mutation, prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors, or expression in prespore cells, nuclear concentration of Skp1 was not detected. Furthermore, nuclear concentration occurred in a mutant that attached only the core disaccharide to Skp1. Overall, there was no evidence for differential Skp1 isoform expression, glycosylation variants in the bulk Skp1 pool, or regulation of nuclear localization. However, these studies uncovered evidence that the glycosylation pathway is developmentally regulated and can function posttranslationally, and that core glycosylation is required for Skp1's nuclear concentration.

Patana Teng-umnuay

Papers

Recruitment of human muscleblind proteins to (CUG)(n) expansions associated with myotonic dystrophy.

Ribonuclear inclusions in skeletal muscle in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2

The Cytoplasmic F-box Binding Protein SKP1 Contains a Novel Pentasaccharide Linked to Hydroxyproline inDictyostelium

Analysis of Skp1 glycosylation and nuclear enrichment in dictyostelium

Identification of a UDP-GlcNAc:Skp1-hydroxyproline GlcNAc-transferase in the cytoplasm of Dictyostelium.