Paul Saurette

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the political relevance of PTR's rhetorical strategies and show that how Canadian PTR talks, particularly its use of populist rhetoric, plays a central role in establishing what type of political deliberation and debate is possible within it.

TL;DR: The authors analyzes the nature of contemporary anti-abortion discourse in Canada and argues that the new antiabortion discourse aims at changing cultural values more than legislation; is explicitly framed as pro-woman; largely avoids appealing to religious grounds; and relies on a new ‘abortion-harms-women' argument that has supplanted and transformed traditional fetal personhood arguments.

TL;DR: The Changing Voice of the Anti-abortion Movement as discussed by the authors explores the role of women in the anti-abortion movement and finds that women are more likely to be targeted by the antiabortion movement than pro-choice feminism.

TL;DR: This article presented a critical discourse analysis of the principal storylines through which the Calgary Herald framed the oil sands between May 1, 2010, and May 31, 2011, revealing that rather than avoiding coverage of environmental protests and critiques, the Herald's narratives used these events to portray the oil and gas industry (and the province and people of Alberta) as victims of an aggressive and well-funded global environmental lobby.

TL;DR: This article conducted a comparative study of how the idea of hypocrisy was invoked in media coverage of climate change in 12 newspapers from four countries (Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States).