scispace - formally typeset
P

Pavel Korshunov

Researcher at Idiap Research Institute

Publications -  89
Citations -  2683

Pavel Korshunov is an academic researcher from Idiap Research Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: JPEG & Privacy software. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 84 publications receiving 2009 citations. Previous affiliations of Pavel Korshunov include École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne & École Normale Supérieure.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Quality evaluation of HEVC and VP9 video compression in real-time applications

TL;DR: This paper provides an answer to the difficult question of which is more efficient in terms of rate-distortion and by how much they outperform the current state-of-the-art coding standard, H.264/AVC for low-delay video applications, e.g., real-time video streaming/conferencing or video surveillance.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Framework for objective evaluation of privacy filters

TL;DR: This paper investigates this privacy-intelligibility tradeoff objectively by proposing an objective framework for evaluation of privacy filters and applies the proposed framework on a use case where privacy of people is protected by obscuring faces, assuming an automated video surveillance system.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Crowdsourcing-based evaluation of privacy in HDR images

TL;DR: The results of the experiments demonstrate a significant loss of privacy when even tone-mapped versions of HDR images are used compared to typical SDR images shot with a standard exposure.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Benchmarking of quality metrics on ultra-high definition video sequences

TL;DR: The findings confirm the content-dependent nature of most metrics (with VIF being the only exception), which has been reported previously for standard and high resolution video sequences.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

HDR image compression: A new challenge for objective quality metrics

TL;DR: Results demonstrate that objective quality assessment of HDR image compression is challenging, and most of the tested metrics, with exceptions of HDR-VDP-2 and FSIM computed for luma component, poorly predict human perception of visual quality.