scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter D. Schellinger

Researcher at Ruhr University Bochum

Publications -  262
Citations -  18189

Peter D. Schellinger is an academic researcher from Ruhr University Bochum. The author has contributed to research in topics: Stroke & Thrombolysis. The author has an hindex of 64, co-authored 240 publications receiving 15911 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter D. Schellinger include University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum & Heidelberg University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Grenzentscheidungen in der Schlaganfalltherapie

TL;DR: In this article, a number of such Grenzsituationen aufgedeckt and diskutiert are discussed, e.g., the Thrombolyse auserhalb geltender Zulassungskriterien (z.b. B. Vorhofflimmern and frischer Stent), or haufig diskuterten Risikokonstellationen (Demenz, Anamnese fur Sturze, Zustand nach intrazerebraler Blutung).
Journal ArticleDOI

Hyperacute treatment of childhood stroke in Lyme neuroborreliosis: report of two cases and systematic review of the literature

TL;DR: Two children with acute stroke associated with LNB who underwent hyperacute stroke treatment are reported and LNB-associated infectious and inflammatory FCA is not a medical contraindication for reperfusion therapies in acute childhood stroke.
Journal ArticleDOI

Case Report: Adult Still's Disease in an Alemtuzumab-Treated Multiple Sclerosis Patient.

TL;DR: A patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, who developed adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) following alemtuzumab treatment is presented, highlighting AOSD as another rare and potentially life-threatening secondary autoinflammatory/autoimmune event following a LemtuzUMab treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prolonged cardiac monitoring for stroke prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials

TL;DR: In this article , a systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting IS rates among patients with known cardiovascular risk factors, including but not limited to history of ischemic stroke, who received PCM for more than 7 days versus more conservative cardiac rhythm monitoring methods were pooled.