A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of determination of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for the diagnosis of bacterial infection. The analysis included published studies that evaluated these markers for the diagnosis of bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. PCT level was more sensitive (88% [95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-93%] vs. 75% [95% CI, 62%-84%]) and more specific (81% [95% CI, 67%-90%] vs. 67% [95% CI, 56%-77%]) than CRP level for differentiating bacterial from noninfective causes of inflammation. The Q value for PCT markers was higher (0.82 vs. 0.73). The sensitivity for differentiating bacterial from viral infections was also higher for PCT markers (92% [95% CI, 86%-95%] vs. 86% [95% CI, 65%-95%]); the specificities were comparable (73% [95% CI, 42%-91%] vs. 70% [95% CI, 19%-96%]). The Q value was higher for PCT markers (0.89 vs. 0.83). PCT markers also had a higher positive likelihood ratio and lower negative likelihood ratio than did CRP markers in both groups. On the basis of this analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT markers was higher than that of CRP markers among patients hospitalized for suspected bacterial infections.

/pdf/serum-procalcitonin-and-c-reactive-protein-levels-as-markers-510g6f49jv.pdf

Serum Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein Levels as Markers of Bacterial Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background The majority of patients undergoing surgical treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction receive antifibrinolytic therapy to limit blood loss. This approach appears counterintuitive to the accepted medical treatment of the same condition — namely, fibrinolysis to limit thrombosis. Despite this concern, no independent, large-scale safety assessment has been undertaken. Methods In this observational study involving 4374 patients undergoing revascularization, we prospectively assessed three agents (aprotinin [1295 patients], aminocaproic acid [883], and tranexamic acid [822]) as compared with no agent (1374 patients) with regard to serious outcomes by propensity and multivariable methods. (Although aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor, here we use the term antifibrinolytic therapy to include all three agents.) Results In propensity-adjusted, multivariable logistic regression (C-index, 0.72), use of aprotinin was associated with a doubling in the risk of renal failure requiring dialysis am...

The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

/pdf/anti-fibrinolytic-use-for-minimising-perioperative-2mv3d62q1l.pdf

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

http://cardiacanaesthesia.in/assets/img/guidelines/Perioperative-Blood-Transfusion-and-Blood-Conservation-in-Cardiac-Surgery.pdf

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline.

Computational Analysis of Microarray Data

https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(07)00362-1/pdf

β-Blocker Prophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Sympathovagal Imbalance

Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: outcome and predictors of complications.

BACKGROUND Former studies on sternal wound infections indicate predisposing factors like diabetes, obesity, use of bilateral internal mammary grafts, impaired renal function and reoperation. We wanted to evaluate whether the time of resternotomy for postoperative bleeding has any influence on the development of a sternal wound infection and other complications. METHODS In our department, 12,315 patients underwent median sternotomy for cardiac surgery between 1987 and 1998. We analyzed the clinical data of all patients which were reoperated on for postoperative bleeding, especially patients with subsequent operations caused by sternal wound infections. All data were compared by T-test respectively chi2-test, and p 48 hours and a stay in hospital >20 days. CONCLUSIONS Early reoperation for postoperative bleeding decreases the number of subsequent complications, e.g. sternal wound infections, septic complications and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Does the time of resternotomy for bleeding have any influence on the incidence of sternal infections, septic courses or further complications?

To determine a possible phase of hypercoagulability after the use of high-dose aprotinin, a prospective randomized double-blind study was performed. Twenty patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery were investigated, a placebo group P (n = 10) was compared to an aprotinin group A (n = 10). Examining parameters of thrombin activation and fibrinolysis, we found during extracorporeal circulation--under continuous aprotinin infusion--a significant inhibition of thrombin activation and fibrinolysis in the aprotinin group (thrombin-antithrombin-III-complexes: 95 +/- 23 micrograms/l, d-dimers: 448 +/- 60 ng/ml, plasminogen activity: 33 +/- 3%, plasminogen activator inhibitor: 98 +/- 14 U/ml) compared to the placebo group (thrombin-antithrombin-III-complexes: 143 +/- 13 micrograms/l, d-dimers: 2755 +/- 430 ng/ml, plasminogen activity: 125 +/- 15%, plasminogen activator inhibitor: 10 +/- 4 U/ml). In contrast, after stopping the aprotinin infusion--from the end of extracorporeal circulation until the morning of the first postoperative day--strong thrombin activation took place in the aprotinin group (d-dimers increased from 472 +/- 90 to 1607 +/- 140 ng/ml), while in the placebo group a decrease could be registered. At this time, the fibrinolysis was still reduced in the aprotinin group (plasminogen activity: 48 +/- 6% vs 85 +/- 16% in the placebo group). In conclusion, interference with the thrombohemorrhagic balance induces hypercoagulability after the use of high-dose aprotinin, with elevated levels of thrombin-antithrombin-III-complexes, d-dimers, and plasminogen and a decreased level of plasminogen activator inhibitor. In our opinion, it is necessary to prevent this counter-regulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Is there a phase of hypercoagulability when aprotinin is used in cardiac surgery

https://hellenicjcardiol.org/archive/full_text/2011/6/2011_6_493.pdf

Peter Feindt

Papers

β-Blocker Prophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Sympathovagal Imbalance

Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: outcome and predictors of complications.

Does the time of resternotomy for bleeding have any influence on the incidence of sternal infections, septic courses or further complications?

Is there a phase of hypercoagulability when aprotinin is used in cardiac surgery

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Extracorporeal Circulation: A Predictive Algorithm for the Patient at Risk