scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter J. Carnevale

Researcher at University of Southern California

Publications -  100
Citations -  8006

Peter J. Carnevale is an academic researcher from University of Southern California. The author has contributed to research in topics: Negotiation & Mediation. The author has an hindex of 42, co-authored 100 publications receiving 7717 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter J. Carnevale include College of Business Administration & Florida State University College of Arts and Sciences.

Papers
More filters
Book

Negotiation in Social Conflict

TL;DR: In this article, the dual concern model and the determinants of problem solving social norms and their impact on negotiation relationships among the negotiating parties are discussed, as well as the group context of negotiation mediation choices among procedures in social conflict.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the influence of positive affect and visual access on the process and outcome of negotiation in an integrative bargaining task and found that positive affect can overcome the competitive processes and poor outcomes normally observed in face-to-face negotiations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Negotiation and mediation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of the state of the art in the field of negation, focusing on the following areas: 1) the nature of issues, 2) options, limits, and outcomes, and 3) strategies for dealing with opposing preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization.

TL;DR: In this article, participants were classified as having cooperative, competitive, or individualistic social values, and were led to expect either cooperation, conflict, or neither in a control, while participants who expected cooperation were more likely to solve Duncker's task and used categories more inclusively, that is, rated low-prototypic exemplars of a category as better members of the category.