P
Peter J. Fish
Researcher at Bangor University
Publications - 56
Citations - 781
Peter J. Fish is an academic researcher from Bangor University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Doppler effect & Signal. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 56 publications receiving 759 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter J. Fish include University of Wales.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Development of an example flow test object and comparison of five of these test objects, constructed in various laboratories
Carolus J.P.M. Teirlinck,R.A. Bezemer,Christian Kollmann,Jaap Lubbers,Peter R. Hoskins,Peter J. Fish,Knud-Erik Fredfeldt,Ulrich G. Schaarschmidt +7 more
TL;DR: The aim of the project partially presented here is the development and validation of an example of a Doppler test object fulfilling the requirements of the IEC 1685, and very precise recipes have been developed for the composition and preparation of both TMM and BMF.
Journal ArticleDOI
Nonstationarity broadening in pulsed doppler spectrum measurements
TL;DR: A data segment length giving maximum spectral resolution is shown to exist for each window type and rate of frequency change, and the effect of mean frequency variation during the data segment has been investigated for different windows and rates of change ofmean frequency.
Journal ArticleDOI
Angle-independent estimation of maximum velocity through stenoses using vector Doppler ultrasound
TL;DR: It is concluded that, when the true velocity lies in the scan plane, the dual-beam system reduces the angle-dependence and, thus, has the potential to improve categorisation of patients with arterial stenoses.
Journal ArticleDOI
Arterial Doppler signal simulation by time domain processing
Yuanyuan Wang,Peter J. Fish +1 more
TL;DR: This computer simulation method based on the application of white noise to a filter with a time-varying impulse response can provide a useful tool for comparison of the performance of Doppler signal processing techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI
Lesion classification using skin patterning.
TL;DR: The observation that skin line patterning tends to be disrupted by malignant but not non‐malignant skin lesions suggests that this could be used as an aid to lesion differentiation.