http://xoomer.virgilio.it/lusebra/NuoviFile/PrevenzioneTVP.pdf

Prevention of venous thromboembolism

Abstract Objective: To determine the effects of “prolonged” antiplatelet therapy (that is, given for one month or more) on “vascular events” (non-fatal myocardial infarctions, non-fatal strokes, or vascular deaths) in various categories of patients. Design: Overviews of 145 randomised trials of “prolonged” antiplatelet therapy versus control and 29 randomised comparisons between such antiplatelet regimens. Setting: Randomised trials that could have been available by March 1990. Subjects: Trials of antiplatelet therapy versus control included about 70 000 “high risk” patients (that is, with some vascular disease or other condition implying an increased risk of occlusive vascular disease) and 30 000 “low risk” subjects from the general population. Direct comparisons of different antiplatelet regimens involved about 10 000 high risk patients. Results: In each of four main high risk categories of patients antiplatelet therapy was definitely protective. The percentages of patients suffering a vascular event among those allocated antiplatelet therapy versus appropriately adjusted control percentages (and mean scheduled treatment durations and net absolute benefits) were: (a) among about 20 000 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 10% antiplatelet therapy v 14% control (one month benefit about 40 vascular events avoided per 1000 patients treated (2P< 0.00001)); (b) among about 20 000 patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, 13% antiplatelet therapy v 17% control (two year benefit about 40/1000 (2P<0.00001)); (c) among about 10 000 patients with a past history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 18% antiplatelet therapy v 22% control (three year benefit about 40/1000 (2P<0.00001)); (d) among about 20 000 patients with some other relevant medical history (unstable angina, stable angina, vascular surgery, angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, peripheral vascular disease, etc), 9% v 14% in 4000 patients with unstable angina (six month benefit about 50/1000 (2P<0.00001)) and 6% v 8% in 16 000 other high risk patients (one year benefit about 20/1000 (2P<0.00001)). Reductions in vascular events were about one quarter in each of these four main categories and were separately statistically significant in middle age and old age, in men and women, in hypertensive and normotensive patients, and in diabetic and non: diabetic patients. Taking all high risk patients together showed reductions of about one third in non-fatal myocardial infarction, about one third in non-fatal stroke, and about one sixth in vascular death (each 2P<0.00001). There was no evidence that non-vascular deaths were increased, so in each of the four main high risk categories overall mortality was significantly reduced. The most widely tested antiplatelet regimen was “medium dose” (75-325 mg/day) aspirin. Doses throughout this range seemed similarly effective (although in an acute emergency it might be prudent to use an initial dose of 160-325 mg rather than about 75 mg). There was no appreciable evidence that either a higher aspirin dose or any other antiplatelet regimen was more effective than medium dose aspirin in preventing vascular events. The optimal duration of treatment for patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack could not be determined directly because most trials lasted only one, two, or three years (average about two years). Nevertheless, there was significant (2P<0.00001) further benefit between the end of year 1 and the end of year 3, suggesting that longer treatment might well be more effective. Among low risk recipients of “primary prevention” a significant reduction of one third in non: fatal myocardial infarction was, however, accompanied by a non-significant increase in stroke. Furthermore, the absolute reduction in vascular events was much smaller than for high risk patients despite a much longer treatment period (4.4% antiplatelet therapy v 4.8% control; five year benefit only about four per 1000 patients treated) and was not significant (2P=0.09). Conclusions: Among a much wider range of patients at high risk of occlusive vascular disease than is currently treated routinely, some years of antiplatelet therapy - with aspirin 75-325 mg/day or some other antiplatelet regimen (provided there are no contraindications) - offers worthwhile protection against myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Significant benefit is evident not only among patients with unstable angina, suspected acute myocardial infarction, or a past history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack, but also among many other categories of high risk patients (such as those having vascular procedures and those with stable angina or peripheral vascular disease). There is as yet, however, no clear evidence on the balance of risks and benefits of antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention among low risk subjects.

Collaborative overview of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy .1. prevention of death, myocardial-infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism : The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

Based on our work and that of many other workers, we have developed a model of coagulation in vivo. Many workers have demonstrated mechanisms by which cells can influence the coagulation process. Nonetheless, the prevailing view of hemostasis remains that the protein coagulation factors direct and control the process with cells serving primarily to provide a phosphatidylserine containing surface on which the procoagulant complexes are assembled. By contrast, we propose a model in which coagulation is regulated by properties of cell surfaces. This model emphasizes the importance of specific cellular receptors for the coagulation proteins. Thus, cells with similar phosphatidylserine content can play very different roles in hemostasis depending on their complement of surface receptors. We propose that coagulation occurs not as a “cascade”, but in three overlapping stages: 1) initiation, which occurs on a tissue factor bearing cell; 2) amplification, in which platelets and cofactors are activated to set the stage for large scale thrombin generation; and 3) propagation, in which large amounts of thrombin are generated on the platelet surface. This cell based model explains some aspects of hemostasis that a protein-centric model does not.

/pdf/a-cell-based-model-of-hemostasis-zdxh6rfu65.pdf

A cell-based model of hemostasis

Pathophysiologic Implications of Membrane Phospholipid Asymmetry in Blood Cells

Retinal Arterial Obstruction in Children and Young Adults

Comparison of bleeding tendency, factor XI coagulant activity, and factor XI antigen in 25 factor XI-deficient kindreds

A method for washing platelets by albumin density gradient separation, originally designed for the study of platelet coagulant activities, has been modified for platelet aggregation and metabolic studies. Platelets are sedimented into a continuous density gradient of isosmolar albumin containing apyrase to protect them from clumping and physical injury and are resuspended in calcium-free Tyrode's solution. The mean recovery of platelets after two separations relative to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was 90.3%. When small amounts of plasma were added to washed platelet suspensions, aggregation and release of [14C]5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) in response to adenosine diphosphate (adp) or 5HT were similar to results obtained with PRP. When fibrinogen was substituted for plasma, ADP-induced aggregation occurred but was feeble. Without added plasma or fibrinogen, platelets were refractory to ADP and insensitive to the cyclic endoperoxide analogue U44619. When both ADP and U44619 were added simultaneously, in low concentrations, to washed platelets without added plasma or fibrinogen, aggregation occurred immediately. Washed platelets were not aggregated by adrenaline, which potentiated ADP-induced aggregation. Several biochemical measurements which are sensitive indicators of cellular damage were normal in washed platelets, including [14C]adenine uptake, adenylate energy charge, hypoxanthine formation and the response of adenylate cyclase to stimulation by PGE1 or PGD2. Platelet coagulant activities were not made available and heparin-neutralizing activity (HNA) was not spontaneously released by the washing procedure, but the washed platelets responded normally to appropriate agents by developing coagulant activities and releasing HNA. The ultrastructure of washed platelets was similar to those in control PRP. Inclusion of apyrase in the first albumin gradient had a beneficial effect on platelet morphology, aggregation and metabolism, but washing at 37degreesC compared with 25degreesC did not. Albumin density gradient separation is a useful method for isolating platelets for aggregation and metabolic studies.

Peter N. Walsh

Papers

Retinal Arterial Obstruction in Children and Young Adults

Comparison of bleeding tendency, factor XI coagulant activity, and factor XI antigen in 25 factor XI-deficient kindreds

Metabolism and function of human platelets washed by albumin density gradient separation.

Contributions of human platelets to the proteolytic activation of blood coagulation factors XII and XI

Factor XI contributes to thrombin generation in the absence of factor XII