P
Peter Reinartz
Researcher at German Aerospace Center
Publications - 413
Citations - 7428
Peter Reinartz is an academic researcher from German Aerospace Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Change detection & Hyperspectral imaging. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 399 publications receiving 6017 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter Reinartz include Qatar Airways & University of Osnabrück.
Papers
More filters
Automatic 3d change detection based on optical satellite stereo imagery
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the detection of changes using Digital Surface Models (DSMs) which are generated from stereo imagery acquired at two different epochs, and the so-called "difference image" method is adopted in this framework where the final DSM is subtracted from the initial one to get the height difference.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Interpretation of SAR images in urban areas using simulated optical and radar images
TL;DR: A method for visual interpreting SAR images by means of optical and SAR images simulated from digital elevation models (DEM), which are derived from LiDAR data, thus enabling easier interpretation of an urban scene.
Automatic generation of digital terrain models from Cartosat-1 stereo images
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a novel algorithm for automatic Digital Terrain Model (DTM) generation from high-resolution CARTOSAT-1 satellite images generating accurate and reliable results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Deep learning decision fusion for the classification of urban remote sensing data
TL;DR: A deep learning decision fusion approach is presented to perform multisensor urban remote sensing data classification by utilizing joint spectral–spatial information and a context-aware object-based postprocessing is used to enhance the classification results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Detection of High-Density Crowds in Aerial Images Using Texture Classification
TL;DR: The results show that a classifier using either BoW or Gabor features can detect crowded image regions with 97% classification accuracy, and in tests of four classes of different crowd-density ranges, BoW–based features have a 5%–12% better accuracy than Gabor.