P
Peter Scalia
Researcher at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Publications - 36
Citations - 425
Peter Scalia is an academic researcher from The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. The author has contributed to research in topics: Decision aids & Health care. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 31 publications receiving 256 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter Scalia include University of Ottawa.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Interventions to Engage Affective Forecasting in Health-Related Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis.
TL;DR: Affective forecasting interventions had a small consistent effect on behavioral outcomes regardless of intervention intensity and conceptual framework, suggesting such constructs are promising intervention targets across several health domains.
Journal ArticleDOI
The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.
Peter Scalia,Marie-Anne Durand,Julia L. Berkowitz,Nithya Puttige Ramesh,Marjan J. Faber,Jan A.M. Kremer,Glyn Elwyn +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of encounter patient decision aids (PDAs) as evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a narrative synthesis of non-randomized studies assessing feasibility, utility and their integration into clinical workflows.
Journal ArticleDOI
Using pictures to convey health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects on patient and consumer health behaviors and outcomes.
Danielle Schubbe,Peter Scalia,Renata W. Yen,Catherine H. Saunders,Sarah Cohen,Glyn Elwyn,Maria van den Muijsenbergh,Marie-Anne Durand +7 more
TL;DR: The results support including pictures in health communication to improve patient knowledge and should be interpreted with caution considering the significant heterogeneity of the meta-analysis outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI
“Provoking conversations”: case studies of organizations where Option Grid™ decision aids have become ‘normalized’
TL;DR: Although both practice settings illustrated the mechanisms of normalization postulated by the theory, the extent to which Option Grid™ was routinely embedded in clinic workflow varied between sites, and between clinicians.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Closer Look at Penicillin Allergy History: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tolerance to Drug Challenge.
Martha DesBiens,Peter Scalia,Saiganesh Ravikumar,Andrew Glick,Helen Newton,Okechukwu Erinne,Natalie B.V. Riblet +6 more
TL;DR: The data suggest that 94.4% of 5,056 participants with reported penicillin allergy determined to be clinically appropriate for allergy evaluation tolerated repeat administration ofPenicillin-based antibiotics without any adverse reactions, which generates meaningful information useful to clinical predictive analytics.