scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter Yeates

Researcher at Keele University

Publications -  28
Citations -  678

Peter Yeates is an academic researcher from Keele University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Competence (human resources). The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 21 publications receiving 507 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter Yeates include University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust & Fairfield General Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Seeing the 'black box' differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives.

TL;DR: Performance assessments, such as workplace‐based assessments (WBAs), represent a crucial component of assessment strategy in medical education and a new field of study focusing on the cognitive processes used by raters, or more inclusively, by assessors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Seeing the same thing differently

TL;DR: This study used a qualitative approach to study assessors’ judgements whilst they observed common simulated videoed performances of junior doctors obtaining clinical histories, and developed three themes that help to explain how variability arises.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘You're certainly relatively competent’: assessor bias due to recent experiences

TL;DR: This work investigated whether confidence in the rating assigned predicts susceptibility to manipulation and whether prompting consideration of typical performance lessens the influence of recent experience.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of exposure to good vs poor medical trainee performance on attending physician ratings of subsequent performances.

TL;DR: In an experimental setting, attending physicians exposed to videos of good medical trainee performances rated subsequent borderline performances lower than those who had been exposed to poor performances, consistent with a contrast bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness of delayed activated charcoal administration in simulated paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose.

TL;DR: These results in healthy volunteers cannot be extrapolated directly to poisoned patients, however, they provide no evidence of efficacy for activated charcoal when administered after an interval of more than 2 h.