Institution
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
Nonprofit•Chicago, Illinois, United States•
About: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education is a nonprofit organization based out in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Graduate medical education & Accreditation. The organization has 155 authors who have published 360 publications receiving 14151 citations. The organization is also known as: ACGME.
Topics: Graduate medical education, Accreditation, Health care, Specialty, Milestone (project management)
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
McGill University1, University of Groningen2, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences3, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education4, University of New South Wales5, Australian National University6, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada7, McMaster University8, University of Dundee9, American Board of Internal Medicine10, Johns Hopkins University11, University of Toronto12, University of Sheffield13, University of Western Ontario14, University of Ottawa15
TL;DR: The evolution of CBME from the outcomes movement in the 20th century to a renewed approach that, focused on accountability and curricular outcomes and organized around competencies, promotes greater learner-centredness and de-emphasizes time-based curricular design is described.
Abstract: Although competency-based medical education (CBME) has attracted renewed interest in recent years among educators and policy-makers in the health care professions, there is little agreement on many aspects of this paradigm. We convened a unique partnership – the International CBME Collaborators – to examine conceptual issues and current debates in CBME. We engaged in a multi-stage group process and held a consensus conference with the aim of reviewing the scholarly literature of competency-based medical education, identifying controversies in need of clarification, proposing definitions and concepts that could be useful to educators across many jurisdictions, and exploring future directions for this approach to preparing health professionals. In this paper, we describe the evolution of CBME from the outcomes movement in the 20th century to a renewed approach that, focused on accountability and curricular outcomes and organized around competencies, promotes greater learner-centredness and de-emphasizes time-based curricular design. In this paradigm, competence and related terms are redefined to emphasize their multi-dimensional, dynamic, developmental, and contextual nature. CBME therefore has significant implications for the planning of medical curricula and will have an important impact in reshaping the enterprise of medical education. We elaborate on this emerging CBME approach and its related concepts, and invite medical educators everywhere to enter into further dialogue about the promise and the potential perils of competency-based medical curricula for the 21st century.
1,683 citations
••
TL;DR: The American Council of Graduate Medical Education is moving from accrediting residency programs every 5 years to a new system for the annual evaluation of trends in measures of performance.
Abstract: The American Council of Graduate Medical Education is moving from accrediting residency programs every 5 years to a new system for the annual evaluation of trends in measures of performance.
1,416 citations
••
TL;DR: This work states that further development of assessment methods is needed to advance in-training evaluation of residents and the ACGME goals for utilizing performance data in accreditation and linking education and patient care quality.
Abstract: Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began an initiative in 1998 to improve resident physicians’ ability to provide quality patient care and to work effectively in c
788 citations
••
TL;DR: Given the importance of assessment and evaluation for CBME, the medical education community will need more collaborative research to address several major challenges in assessment, including “best practices” in the context of systems and institutional culture and how to best to train faculty to be better evaluators.
Abstract: Competency-based medical education (CBME), by definition, necessitates a robust and multifaceted assessment system. Assessment and the judgments or evaluations that arise from it are important at the level of the trainee, the program, and the public. When designing an assessment system for CBME, medical education leaders must attend to the context of the multiple settings where clinical training occurs. CBME further requires assessment processes that are more continuous and frequent, criterion-based, developmental, work-based where possible, use assessment methods and tools that meet minimum requirements for quality, use both quantitative and qualitative measures and methods, and involve the wisdom of group process in making judgments about trainee progress. Like all changes in medical education, CBME is a work in progress. Given the importance of assessment and evaluation for CBME, the medical education community will need more collaborative research to address several major challenges in assessment, including ‘‘best practices’’ in the context of systems and institutional culture and how to best to train faculty to be better evaluators. Finally, we must remember that expertise, not competence, is the ultimate goal. CBME does not end with graduation from a training program, but should represent a career that includes ongoing assessment.
652 citations
••
TL;DR: Proposed modifications in the current requirements for medical residency training programs, including in the limits on resident hours, are explained and input on the new requirements is invited.
Abstract: A task force of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has proposed modifications in the current requirements for medical residency training programs, including in the limits on resident hours. This article explains the proposed changes and the rationale for them and invites input on the new requirements, which are scheduled for implementation in 2011.
549 citations
Authors
Showing all 159 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David B. Hoyt | 95 | 455 | 31309 |
Nicholas M. Barbaro | 72 | 225 | 17751 |
Kevin B. Weiss | 70 | 270 | 20773 |
Karl Y. Bilimoria | 66 | 374 | 18541 |
Eric S. Holmboe | 65 | 301 | 15577 |
Timothy C. Flynn | 52 | 169 | 8293 |
David M. Irby | 51 | 165 | 11323 |
J. David Richardson | 45 | 163 | 6877 |
Stanley J. Hamstra | 40 | 129 | 8593 |
Karen E. Hauer | 38 | 174 | 5525 |
Shiphra Ginsburg | 36 | 94 | 4090 |
James P. Bagian | 34 | 88 | 4853 |
Kyle M Fargen | 33 | 208 | 3701 |
Thomas J. Nasca | 30 | 69 | 6137 |
Anthony D. Yang | 25 | 115 | 3111 |