scispace - formally typeset
P

Philip G. Pardey

Researcher at University of Minnesota

Publications -  287
Citations -  9330

Philip G. Pardey is an academic researcher from University of Minnesota. The author has contributed to research in topics: Agriculture & Agricultural productivity. The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 282 publications receiving 8816 citations. Previous affiliations of Philip G. Pardey include International Food Policy Research Institute & University of California, Berkeley.

Papers
More filters
Book

A meta-analysis of rates of return to agricultural R&D : ex pede Herculem?

TL;DR: Pinstrup et al. as mentioned in this paper presented the first attempt to take a comprehensive look at all the available evidence on rates of return to investments in agricultural R&D since 1953, and the only attempt to do so in a formal statistical fashion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Agricultural Research, Productivity, and Food Prices in the Long Run

TL;DR: A reinvestment in agricultural R&D is critical to ensuring sufficient food for the world in the coming decades, and long-run trends in global food commodity prices are driven by differential rates of growth in the supply and demand for food crops, feed, and livestock products.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research returns redux: a meta‐analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D

TL;DR: In this paper, a total of 289 studies of returns to agricultural R&D were compiled and these provide 1821 estimates of rates of return, after removing statistical outliers and incomplete observations.
Posted ContentDOI

Slow magic: agricultural R&D a century after Mendel.

TL;DR: The authors assembles and assesses new evidence regarding investments in agricultural R&D, tracking global trends over the past several decades, and highlighting the critical importance that the accumulated stock of scientific knowledge has for today's productivity and for future innovations and economic growth.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research, productivity, and output growth in Chinese agriculture

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use a newly constructed panel data set that includes an agricultural research or stock-of-knowledge variable to quantify the sources of growth in Chinese agriculture and find that research-induced technical change accounts for a significant share (20%) of the growth in agricultural output since 1965.